Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/22/2009 at 10:41 EDT, Stephen Frazier ste...@doc.state.ok.us wrote: So SSI (zVM0 is HA (VMware) and Live Guest Relocation (zVM) is vmotion (VMware). I don't know what zVM0 is, so I can't answer your question. The architecture is SSI or HA and LGR or vmotion is what you can do

Re: Delete cms file record using PIPE

2009-10-23 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Gonen Shoham gone...@sapiens.com wrote: I am not a PIPE expert The criteria is actually delete lines where word(1) = 'XX' and word(3) = 'YY' and substring(25,1) = 'a'   etc We probably should have such discussions on CMSPIP-L instead... The etc makes

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Huegel, Thomas
Personally I wish people would quit trying to compare z/VM with vmWARE. There is really no comparison. I also wish people would quit referring to vmWARE VM... It only confuses those in the executive suite. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Alan

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Mike Walter
I also wish people would quit referring to vmWARE VM... It only confuses those in the executive suite. What's wrong with referring to VMware (proper case sensitivity) as VM? Oh wait... that's right, VM _really_ means: Virtual Memory ooops, Voice Mail... hmmm, Java Virtual

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Scott Rohling
I just say zVM (or zed-VM) whenever referring to 'our' VM -- that seems to keep everyone clear. And I don't refer to VMWare at all - which keeps it even clearer ;-) Scott On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@hewitt.com wrote: I also wish people would quit referring to

Re: Delete cms file record using PIPE

2009-10-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
Look at the sample in one of my previous posts. Change the w2 to w3 and you have it. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Gonen Shoham Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:40 PM To:

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Stephen Frazier
When you must support both you need to always state which you are referring to (zVM) or (VMware). Scott Rohling wrote: I just say zVM (or zed-VM) whenever referring to 'our' VM -- that seems to keep everyone clear. And I don't refer to VMWare at all - which keeps it even clearer ;-)

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
What a novel suggestion, speak to the level of the intended audience. Strunk and White could not convince folks to do it. I wish you good luck in your efforts. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On

Re: Delete cms file record using PIPE

2009-10-23 Thread Brian Nielsen
Another generic solution that avoids multi-stream pipes is: PIPE input file a | REXX filter | output file a and code the REXX filter stage to do whatever complicated filtering process you want to do. Brian Nielsen On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:15:25 +0200, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I don't know what zVM0 is, so I can't answer your question. Reading the whole sentence, (zVM0 was meant to be (zVM). He just didn't hold the shift key down for the right paren. Yes, I know it should be z/VM.          Dennis My computer beat me at

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 10/23/2009 at 12:34 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com wrote: I don't know what zVM0 is, so I can't answer your question. Reading the whole sentence, (zVM0 was meant to be (zVM). He just didn't hold the shift key down for the right paren. Yes, I know it

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
That sentence wasn't red, it was black. :-)(This must be Friday.) Regards, Richard Schuh Thanks - I didn't notice the unmatched parens even though I red the whole sentence.

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread Bob Woodside
On Friday 23 October 2009, Schuh, Richard wrote: That sentence wasn't red, it was black. :-)(This must be Friday.) ...and not a moment too soon! :-) Cheers, Bob -- Bob Woodside Woodsway Consulting, Inc. http://www.woodsway.com

Re: z/VM 6.1 G.A. targeted for this Friday, Oct 23

2009-10-23 Thread P S
And while we're debating correct terminology, remember that it's z/VM. The slash is required: it's software. z/VM, z/OS, z/VSE, z/TPF, z/Architecture (yeah, that's considered software). z10, z9, z900, z800, etc. -- hardware.

Sending an SNMPTRAP alert from Velocity to NETCOOL/OMNIBUS console

2009-10-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Hi I am trying to send an ALERT captured in Velocity ESAMON over to our NETCOOL/OMNIBUS console. I have the Velocity piece set up and we can see that the ALERT gets to the OMNIBUS console. See logs below. However nothing is being done with it because the OMNIBUS guy tells me that there needs

Re: Sending an SNMPTRAP alert from Velocity to NETCOOL/OMNIBUS console

2009-10-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 10/23/2009 at 04:36 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote: I am also a little confused between a MIB and an OID in some of the documentation I read they seem to be used interchangeable. A MIB (Management Information Base) is a collection of related

Question on SSLSERV and multiple stacks

2009-10-23 Thread Marcy Cortes
I finally got SSLESRV working on 5.4 with our CA. Yay! Now.. If I have more than one TCPIP stack on a system, say TCPIP and TCPIP2. I figure I'll need an SSLSERV and an SSLSERV2. But can they share /etc/gskadm/Database.kdb ? I can't see why not. And.. If I've done that, can they use the same

Re: Sending an SNMPTRAP alert from Velocity to NETCOOL/OMNIBUS console

2009-10-23 Thread Barton Robinson
I'm interested too. I've not been able to get omnibus doc so would be great if someone could provide doc on what is needed. We (Velocity Software/ESALPS/zVPS) provide a lot of data and a lot of alerts. Sending alerts somewhere that does not acknowledge doesn't do anyone any good, and we are

OT (Software or not software)..

2009-10-23 Thread Ivan Warren
P S wrote: And while we're debating correct terminology, remember that it's z/VM. The slash is required: it's software. z/VM, z/OS, z/VSE, z/TPF, z/Architecture (yeah, that's considered software). z10, z9, z900, z800, etc. -- hardware. Almost but... Those products are still part of STG

Re: OT (Software or not software)..

2009-10-23 Thread P S
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ivan Warren i...@vmfacility.fr wrote: Almost but... Those products are still part of STG (Systems Technology Group), not SWG (Software Group) - so they are not really to be referred as software (i.e. not part of either Lotus/Websphere/Tivoli/IM/Rational

Re: OT (Software or not software)..

2009-10-23 Thread Ivan Warren
P S wrote: Heh? STG has no software? That'll be a surprise to them... Of course they have software.. but it's not software.. It's usually Licensed Internal Code, or a System Product.. or some Systems Offering.. But it's irrelevant.. The problem is that both divisions have decent