I will be out of the office starting 11/18/2009 and will not return until
11/20/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
*** IMPORTANT
NOTE* The opinions expressed in this
message and/or any attachments are those of the author and n
On Wednesday, 11/18/2009 at 05:27 EST, P S wrote:
> And here's one I found from an old MP3000 we had:
>
> DEVICE d...@4f0 CTC 4F0
> LINK VM1CTC1 CTC 0 d...@4f0
> HOME
> 10.3.1.254 VM1CTC1
> GATEWAY
> 10.3.1.1 = VM1CTC1 1492 HOST
> START d...@4f0
That is a CTC, not an ethernet adapter. MP30
Hi, David.
If memory serves, CALLER was an IBM internal use only tool that allowed
Rexx execs to share variables across a chain of nested execs. Its
function can now be easily replicated today using PIPE functionality;
the VAR stages.
If your looking for something with a bit more easy of
Maybe even easier than Brian suggested, depending on your purpose. If all you
want to do is to prevent CP from complaining about the disk not being present
during start-up, simply removing the disk from the list should suffice. If you
want to remove the disk from the system, you will need to DET
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:37:03 -0700, Wandschneider, Scott
wrote:
>Can a volume be removed from the User_Volume_List without IPL'ing?
>If so, how?
Yes. Two easy steps:
1) Update the User_Volume_List and then don't IPL. :)
2) DETACH the volume FROM SYSTEM after there are no more active links to
Can a volume be removed from the User_Volume_List without IPL'ing? If so, how?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457|| : 402.963.8905 || :847.849.7223 || :
scott.wandschnei...@infocrossi
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Billy R. Bingham <
billy.bingham...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would anyone like to share their VM TCP/IP definitions for a MP3000 with
> ETHERNET cards?
>
And here's one I found from an old MP3000 we had:
DEVICE d...@4f0 CTC 4F0
LINK VM1CTC1 CTC 0 d...@
On Wednesday, 11/18/2009 at 04:24 EST, Les Koehler
wrote:
> Are you sure that wasn't "STATE CALLER MODULE *" ? At one
> point before I retired, CALLER was Internal Use Only. Is it
> on VM downloads now?
Depending on what the exec is trying to do, consider using CMS Pipelines
or the DMSCALLR CSL
Billy,
I have an MP3000 with VM TCP/IP is this what you need?
DEVICE KSUVMTR LCS F40
LINK KSUVM ETHERNET 1 KSUVMTR
I am not sure really what you need by the question you asked, but I am sure I
have it.
Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
F
Are you sure that wasn't "STATE CALLER MODULE *" ? At one
point before I retired, CALLER was Internal Use Only. Is it
on VM downloads now?
Les
David Sanchez wrote:
Hi Listers,
As a longtime z/OS systems programmer I've done quite a few Rexx/ISPF
applications. I'm new to the VM world and si
On Wednesday, 11/18/2009 at 03:30 EST, Rob van der Heij
wrote:
> "One at a time. But when it does not need to all the time, different
> servers can take turns. We call that virtualization."
e-Juggling(tm)
It is like asking "How many items can a professional juggler carry?"
- Do the items all h
Hi Listers,
As a longtime z/OS systems programmer I've done quite a few Rexx/ISPF
applications. I'm new to the VM world and since we don't have ISPF for V
M
I downloaded RXDISP from IBM's VM downloads. The RXDISP exec fails when
it executes the line ADDRESS command 'SITE CALLER MODULE'.
I
Hello,
Would anyone like to share their VM TCP/IP definitions for a MP3000 with
ETHERNET cards?
Billy
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Marcy Cortes
wrote:
> When I get asked how many can run on an IFL (which I know wasn't what you
> asked, August), my new answer is "How many rocks can you carry?" ;)
:-) Yours is probably better than mine:
"One at a time. But when it does not need to all the
On 11/18/09 1:59 PM, "James Vincent" wrote:
> Our charge-back model is that there is a basic monthly charge for the server
> and support, tiered by what level of support and high-availability you want.
> I believe there are three or four basic server "models" you can select from;
> from non-HA
As long as you run EXACTLY the same thing on each linux server with the same
users, same transactions and same configuration, then you can be successful
in answering how many will fit on an IFL. :-)
Our charge-back model is that there is a basic monthly charge for the server
and support, tiered b
What a timely question! Management is after me to quantify how many
guests we can run on our 1 IFL for billing purposes. They want to carve
it up into units so they know how many total we have, and therefore can
charge per server. I don't see it going that way, as several of you have
pointed out: i
17 matches
Mail list logo
