The real problem is that the third-party vendors do not all comply with the
standard.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 5:12 PM
To:
The real problem is that the third-party vendors do not all comply with
the standard.
I'll second that. If this is the future strategy, then one of the things that
needs to happen ASAP is that IBM needs to aggressively provide education to
vendors and users alike on how to package stuff
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Timothy Sipples recently posted that it was incorrect.
He is the first IBM'r to say something about these 'plans'.
Until I hear it from an official IBM source, it is a rumour.
Or a rumor, in the US :-)
Count me firmly in the
On Sunday, 03/07/2010 at 12:00 EST, Phil Smith III li...@akphs.com
wrote:
But since both Timothy (on IBM-MAIN) and Alan (on IBMVM) have stated
that there
is no official statement of direction, then the good news is that it's
not even
a rumor at this point -- it's fiction. What we need to
On Sunday, 03/07/2010 at 10:54 EST, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
The real problem is that the third-party vendors do not all comply with
the
standard.
You've had 25 years to apply pressure and they've had 25 years to respond.
How much longer should we wait? (I know of one vendor
