I am out of the office until 12/27/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBMVM Digest - 22 Dec
2010 to 23 Dec 2010 (#2010-345)" sent on 12/24/2010 1:09:57 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
John was right, you can't set a timeout for sfs commands. Having another
ID hx your ID after a too-long wait is about it. That said, you're better
off trying to find out why your workunit is hanging and solve the *real*
problem. Maybe the server is hung up on a backup.
Depending on what's going
John was right, you can't cause an sfs command to time out.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Ackerman [alan.acker...@bankofamerica.com]
Sent: 12/23/2010 06:09 PM CST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Time out an SFS command
Moving this question from CMS-PIPELINES to IBMVM, si
John was right, you can't cancel an SFS command
Moving this question from CMS-PIPELINES to IBMVM, since I am assured by
John Hartmann that it cannot be done with CMS Pipelines. Anyone figured
out how to get it to time out?
Sender: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List
From: "Ackerman, Alan"
Subject: Time out a CMS command
Is
I wonder if the Princeton VMNET software is still available. I wrote some mods
to that code long long ago that expanded it to provide general CTC support over
IP, not just NJE. Dunno if I still have them, but IIRC, it wasn't that
difficult.
Also ...
3. Does not handle BFS
-- R; <><
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 18:10, Schuh, Richard wrote:
> For me, SFS is enough. In a former life, I did write a
> complex APPC application that involved code and data in VM, MVS and TPF.
> That was enough to make me swear off of APPC unle
Thanks for the suggestion, but there is no FICON directory. Sounds like
I'm SOL for now. It would have been nice to be able to do it via
internal hipersocket. I'll look into IPGATE. That might be useful. In
any case, it isn't a big deal. It was mainly a convenience for myself
and the other sy
I took the freedom to enhance the code a bit.
I did regret that there was no way to for example perform a hex sort. So,
my enhancement allows the user to pass either simple arguments for the SORT
stage, or to pass a few stages, which would normally include a SORT. I also
changed the parse of the
