Speaking of submitting jobs, does anyone remember of have a copy of the old
SUB EXEC that was floating around the network some years back? In addition to
doing the requisite SPOOL/TAG/PUNCH commands, it also provided for parameter
substitution, includes and nested includes.
I seem to have
Hello List,
We have a CMS file, with some fields.
One of this field is a date, in the DD/MM/YY format.
We also have 200 records medium by day.
Another field, is a numeric percentage that I need get the top 50 for each day.
So, We think execute a sort under a REXX EXEC , like this :
trace r
How can I tell what users and/or what files are in a storage group? I'd
prefer to know users but can trace it back if I know what files.
Thanks,
Steve
Steve, grab Kris Buelen's SFSULIST tool from the VM download page; it
does exactly what you are looking for.
Have a good one.
On 01/04/2011 08:13 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
How can I tell what users and/or what files are in a storage group? I'd
prefer to know users but can trace it back if I
PIPEs would be much easier.
PIPE (endchar ?),
input file x,
| SORT positions,
| output file y
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Sergio
Thanks Dave. I was sure there was something out there that would
provide this info. I had SFSULIST already downloaded just didn't know
that's what it would/could do.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sergio -
Take a look at HELP PIPE SORT.
'PIPE cpux9 batchw a | sort 1-8 descending 63-65 | cpux9 batd a'
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 47 years
mailto:f...@zvm.sru.edu http://zvm.sru.edu/~fjh +1.724.738.2153
Yes, Virginia, there is a
Hello Frank, and Fran.
PIPE run well.
pipe cpux9 batchw a | sort 1-8 descending 63-65 | cpux9 batd a
Thanks very much for your help.
Regards,
Sergio
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:37:44 -0500
From: f...@zvm.sru.edu
Subject: Re: Sort Fields Question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
And, as he only want the first 50, the pipe can be easily extended:
'PIPE cpux9 batchw a | sort 1-8 descending 63-65 | take 50 | cpux9
bat50 a'
What then? Process in REXX? If so, change the pipe to write into a stem
'PIPE cpux9 batchw a | sort 1-8 descending 63-65 | take 50 | stem REC.'
do
SFSULIST is an interactive tool. If you need this information in a REXX
exec: Q LIMITS is your friend. If you also need to know the files: after Q
LIMITS, you use LISTDIR; ACCESS and LISTFILE...
2011/1/4 Gentry, Stephen stephen.gen...@lafayettelife.com
Thanks Dave. I was sure there was
I'll send my old submit stuff, dated from a former life where I had many
VM/VSE customers
2011/1/4 Shedlock, George gshedl...@aegonusa.com
Speaking of submitting jobs, does anyone remember of have a copy of the old
“SUB EXEC” that was floating around the network some years back? In addition
Steve, note that your user id must be enrolled in the file pool as an
administrator for SFSULIST to return all of the menaingful results.
DJ
On 01/04/2011 08:25 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
Thanks Dave. I was sure there was something out there that would
provide this info. I had SFSULIST
(Subject line changed to reflect topic drift)
Alan Altmark writes:
As others have said, the problem is in the logmode associated with the
non-SNA 3270 LU. For some reason, VTAM sysprogs keep using ancient
logmodes for reasons they can't actually articulate except that's the way
we've
Sergio,
Others have already pointed you at PIPE, I use it myself for
descending sorts. There is no descending option in CMS SORT. There is
a descending option in the XEDIT SORT command.
I don't know if your data is going to span across months, but sorting
the date formatted as DD/MM/YY using
Hello John.
Very creative.
I need learn much more.
Thanks very much
Regards,
Sergio
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:36:27 -0600
From: john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Subject: Re: Assembler Question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I guess this is to stop the no-so-smart. The first thing that
On Tuesday, 01/04/2011 at 10:58 EST, Malcolm Beattie beatt...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:
Alan Altmark writes:
As others have said, the problem is in the logmode associated with the
non-SNA 3270 LU. For some reason, VTAM sysprogs keep using ancient
logmodes for reasons they can't actually
Good is a relative term when discussing VTAM :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
It wouldn't
be the first time that VM accidentally got Good Stuff that
MVS didn't.
We have the master copy of our tools disk in SFS on one system. Each system
has a local copy on minidisk. A job on each system accesses the master and
applies updates to the local copy every night. If the SFS master isn't
available, no harm is done to the copies.
tyvm, Chip, for the explanation. So this century really began in Jan 1,
2001, not 2000. Interesting.
Certainly glad it was the C programmers, not the BAL programmers, that
went wrong.
A good BAL programmer knows that everything is relative 0, not 1.
Chip Davis c...@aresti.com
Sent by:
Or better yet... _why_?
It sounds as if you want to display users and mdisks, sorted by user (and
perhaps mdisk, too) which reside between gaps.
But _why_? What are you attempting to do?
Mike Walter
Aon Corporation
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Tom
It is right with the DATE(B) function - 01/01/1001.
All the technicalities aside, forget about the word Century and view the
letter C as an abstraction for the described function. Then, everything is
consistent, even if technically incorrect.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Well, not quite, unless you're using a VERY non-ANSI-Standard version
of Rexx. :-)
Say Date('U',0,'B') -- 01/01/01
But you're right about the C for Century; it was always better to
think of it as the Roman numeral for 100. It still suffered from the
same boundary issues as the old Julian
22 matches
Mail list logo
