Since I came in this morning and it has magically repaired itself, I think
that this may indeed be the problem. I'll go in and turn off caching on the
shared disks today so as to avoid this issue next weekend when we install
our second z10.
Thanks.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
Robert,
I normally test it manually:
Logon MAINT (at Z10)
DIRM USER WITHPASS
DIRECTXA USER WITHPASS
If something goes wrong, change it:
Note: $DIRCTL$ is a pseudo user for Directory statements.
DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ GET
CP Q CPUID
XEdit $DIRCTL$ DIRECT (and update)
DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ REPlace
Presentations from the last Hillgang meeting are available at
http://www.sinenomine.net/node/722
I am out of the office until 24/03/2011.
I am on vacation with no access to e-mails and limited access to phone.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: Anyone using
Dirmaint with a z10? sent on 3/21/11 19:24:39.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person
Hi Folks
I currently have a layer3 VSWITCH defined. This vswitch has been used
for production guest machines so I don't want to break this.
I have a need for a layer2 VSWITCH.
My Layer2 VSWITCH is on CHPID 01, using devices 0D10-0D12. Current subnet
is 10.207.1.x
I want to add a Layer2
Running multiple VSWITCHs on the same OSA is a perfectly standard thing to
do.
They don't have to be same layer 2 / 3.
Only question is why you don't use a backup OSA or link aggregation to
protect from a single OSA port/card/IO cage or network switch failure.
That's not what you asked
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 09:11 EDT, gclo...@br.ibm.com wrote:
Robert,
I normally test it manually:
Logon MAINT (at Z10)
DIRM USER WITHPASS
DIRECTXA USER WITHPASS
If something goes wrong, change it:
Note: $DIRCTL$ is a pseudo user for Directory statements.
DIRM FOR $DIRCTL$ GET
Tom,
Can I use devices 0D13-0D15 on CHPID 01
Be sure Q D13-D15 replies with OSA FREE. Or conversely, use Q OSA
FREE to be sure these devices are available.
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Karl,
I run layer 2 and layer 3 on the same OSA. I believe that the
addresses must begin on an even boundary, therefore you would need to
begin with 0D14-0D16.
Bob
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Karl Kingston
Sent:
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 02:14 EDT, Bob McCarthy
bob.mccar...@custserv.com wrote:
I run layer 2 and layer 3 on the same OSA. I believe that the
addresses must
begin on an even boundary, therefore you would need to begin with
0D14-0D16.
OSAs haven't required even boundaries for a long
It seems that z/VSE does have this restriction (and it's the REAL not
VIRTUAL addresses that must be an even-odd pair).
Just a FYI,
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday,
This appliance can connect to a VSWITCH?
Yes. It will tolerate both layer 2 and layer 3 VSWITCHes.
And how will my
SMTP talk to it? Over CTC? HS?
What we suggest for front-ending these older VM TCP services is that you get
another IP address from your networking folks (just one is
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 05:50 EDT, clifford jackson
cliffordjackson...@msn.com wrote:
What are the major differences between filecontrol and directorycontrol
in a
SFS structure
DIRECTORY CONTROL directories have two important attributes:
1. You don't seen any changes to any files until
Does FILE CONTROL thus have the same exposure to a file being changed 'under the
covers' as a minidisk has, possibly causing an error for the other users?
Is there something similar to the minidisk trick of:
copyfile new1 version a pseudo1 name k (noupdir
copyfile new2 version a pseudo2 name
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 10:54 EDT, Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com
wrote:
Does FILE CONTROL thus have the same exposure to a file being changed
'under the
covers' as a minidisk has, possibly causing an error for the other
users?
Is there something similar to the minidisk trick of:
So with FILE CONTROL you can't replace co-dependent files in one atomic
operation, as one would do with the 'copyfile two-step' (love that phrase!)?
Les
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 10:54 EDT, Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.com
wrote:
Does FILE CONTROL thus have the same
16 matches
Mail list logo