Thanks to all who have responded to this post. There are many interesting ideas that I can present to the upgrade team. I know that I have brought this subject up before as someone mentioned but at that time, it was mainly for OS upgrade (where I was concerned about 370 mode) on our current platfor
Richard: Yes, thanks - I remembered after I sent the note and went home for the day that 370 mode is also machine dependant as well. Karl SeversonIBM VM System AdministratorRaytheon CompanyEl Segundo, California---Different
Richard:We have 370 mode in V2.3 so that's no problem. My concern is it's lack of availability in the more recent versions of zVM/CMS. That's why we would need to run a guest VM/ESA or maybe zVM 3.1 partition under the latest zVM so we could keep 370 mode. At least that's my understanding. Karl Sev
Same here. Our zFrame 8 has been running for over 4 years without any unplanned loss of service that wasn't operator error. The hardware is IBM though. I don't remember what T3 uses. Karl SeversonRaytheon CompanyStephen Frazier wrote:I haven't used a T3 system. However, we have had a FLEX-ES system
I thought I'd do a follow up on this problem for anyone who might be interested and who may have a similar setup to the one we do. I was fairly confident that VM:Operator wasn't to blame for the problem but contacted CA anyway since the only error codes we ever got were from VM:Operator. After CA
I thought I'd do a follow up on this problem for anyone who might be interested and who may have a similar setup to the one we do. I was fairly confident that VM:Operator wasn't to blame for the problem but contacted CA anyway since the only error codes we ever got were from VM:Operator. After CA a
That's okay. I'll be checking with Computer Associates tomorrow since the error message I was getting was from VM:Operator. I checked to make sure we were running the most recent version of VM:Manager and Operator and we appear to be. Somehow though I think it's a TCPIP problem but I don't really c
-The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote: -To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUFrom: Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System Date: 07/21/2008 11:45AMSubject: Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 CodeI would guess that every weekend a firewall is rebooted. I don't understand about "rebo
I was happy to see that others are using PCOMM so perhaps someone will be able to figure out my plight. I use the OS/2 flavor (4.21) and promptly each Saturday, my console and any other open sessions running VM go blank and there is a 658 code on the bottom of the frame of each open session. I don'
I was happy to see that others are using PCOMM so perhaps someone will be able to figure out my plight. I use the OS/2 flavor (4.21) and promptly each Saturday, my console and any other open sessions running VM go blank and there is a 658 code on the bottom of the frame of each open session. I don'
10 matches
Mail list logo
