, July 13, 2010 11:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRLE with Vswitch
On Tuesday, 07/13/2010 at 11:38 EDT, Pelletier, Daniel
daniel.pellet...@uconn.edu wrote:
Thanks for the reply. We are not sharing a virtual NIC, so I guess the
Portname is not needed. But, I still do not see why
We are in the process of installing zOS V1R7 on our z10 BC machine. We are
attempting to connect
Our MVS TCPIP, running as a guest to VM, via VSWITCH to a QDIO OSA. We get
the OSA address's
Allocated and busy and we can ping the MVS TCPIP and that works fine. We cannot
ping or connect
To any
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:08 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRLE with Vswitch
Does the PORTNAME match the name of the vswitch?
From where can you PING the MVS TCPIP?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pelletier, Daniel
daniel.pellet
Alan,,,
Thanks for the reply. We are not sharing a virtual NIC, so I guess the
Portname is not needed. But, I still do not see why we cannot connect to our
other Host
Or to Telnet. Any ideas will be appreciated.
TIA
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
We have just installed zVm 5.4 on our system. Now we are running with a
SSLSERV that resides in VM/CMS. Since we have been at this level, we have been
getting TN3270 Telnet sessions running in Clear mode. We have included the
SSLSERVERID in our TCPIP stack but this has not corrected the
in the InternalClientParm section.
If this is SECURECONNECTION NEVER it will always be clear.
You probably want REQUIRED or PREFERRED.
Marci Beach
From:
Pelletier, Daniel daniel.pellet...@uconn.edu
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
11/13/2009 10:41 AM
Subject:
Clear Sessions with SSL
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:02 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Clear Sessions with SSL under zVM 5.4
On Friday, 11/13/2009 at 10:41 EST, Pelletier, Daniel
daniel.pellet...@uconn.edu wrote:
We have just installed zVm 5.4
