Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-20 Thread Imler, Steven J
Subject: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool We are moving from 3390 to 3390, so I plan on using DDR to move the volumes containing ordinary spool files but just format and allocate the disks specified as DUMP. I can do the format/allocate while the system is running. My aim is to minimize the downtime

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-20 Thread Schuh, Richard
Subject: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool We are moving from 3390 to 3390, so I plan on using DDR to move the volumes containing ordinary spool files but just format and allocate the disks specified as DUMP. I can do the format/allocate while the system is running. My aim is to minimize the downtime

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-20 Thread Schuh, Richard
-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fran Hensler Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 5:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool Richard - If you have a standalone system like Tom Kern suggested you would not need

{SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-19 Thread Schuh, Richard
We are moving from 3390 to 3390, so I plan on using DDR to move the volumes containing ordinary spool files but just format and allocate the disks specified as DUMP. I can do the format/allocate while the system is running. My aim is to minimize the downtime, even if it takes more work to do so. I

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-19 Thread Thomas Kern
I have DDRed non-active SPOOL volumes without problems. My standalone system is perfect for that. It is self-contained and does NOT touch the production volumes. The production volumes can be dumped, copied, restored, whatever and then you can bring up your production system using the new DASD

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-19 Thread Schuh, Richard
: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool I have DDRed non-active SPOOL volumes without problems. My standalone system is perfect for that. It is self-contained and does NOT touch the production volumes. The production volumes can be dumped

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-19 Thread Fran Hensler
Richard - If you have a standalone system like Tom Kern suggested you would not need to use SPXTAPE. /Fran On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:11:30 -0800 Schuh, Richard said: Is there some reason to not DDR them? The system will be down, so

Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool

2007-12-19 Thread Ron Schmiedge
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: {SPAM?} RE: Moving Spool I have DDRed non-active SPOOL volumes without problems. My standalone system is perfect for that. It is self-contained and does NOT touch