the word USING.
>
> e.g.
>
> DEDICATE vucb USING rucb
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Rich Greenberg
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:24 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: At
two UCBs was the word USING.
e.g.
DEDICATE vucb USING rucb
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a
On: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:59:07AM -0400,Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] Wrote:
} Oh nuts, I've got it backwards! Works fine with the correct syntax.
Don't feel bad, people have been screwing that up since CP-67. :-)
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
I should have said 'does not work'. It was because I had the syntax backwards
Yep ! got that straight !
Was just saying that it would have been easier to just have a copy of
the error message you were getting (probably "HCPATR040E Device 0900
does not exi
rk.edu] On Behalf
Of Ivan Warren
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
> I want to add this to USER DIRECT but a DEDICATE will not work and I don't
> see how MDISK will. Can
ing System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:43 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest
On Thursday, 04/23/2009 at 09:00 EDT, "Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]"
wrote:
> Oh nuts, I?ve got i
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
I want to add this to USER DIRECT but a DEDICATE will not work and I don't see
how MDISK will. Can somebody enlighten me?
I think what every one is wondering is : what do you mean by "will not
work" ?!
--Ivan
On Thursday, 04/23/2009 at 09:00 EDT, "Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]"
wrote:
> Oh nuts, I?ve got it backwards! Works fine with the correct syntax.
BTW, in order to preserve your sanity (if it's not too late!) you can
replace
DEDICATE 0900
with
COMMAND ATTACH TO * 0900
This works e
rsday, April 23, 2009 8:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest
Bobby,
a DEDICATE will work - remember the Virtual address is first and the Real
address is second
USER MLXX MLXX 3072M 3072M G
INCLUDE LINDFLT
MACHINE ESA
SHARE RELATIV
www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/
"Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]"
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
04/23/2009 08:47 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Attaching a real scsi device to a guest
We have been fortunate to obta
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest
>
> We have been fortunate to obtain a small SAN device to play with in
> place of the 3390's that we are currently using to run z/VM and our
> Redhat Linux guest. I've been able to dynamically attach
We have been fortunate to obtain a small SAN device to play with in place of
the 3390's that we are currently using to run z/VM and our Redhat Linux guest.
I've been able to dynamically attach, configure a file system and mount it. The
attach command went like:
ATTACH to LSSB as 0900
I wan
12 matches
Mail list logo
