Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Marcy Cortes
What is wrong with this device? Why can't I detach it from system? q de33 DASD DE33 CP SYSTEM V8XES1 0 Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:43:51 det de33 system

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Imler, Steven J
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Can't detach a DASD device from system What is wrong with this device? Why can't I detach it from system? q de33 DASD DE33 CP SYSTEM V8XES1 0 Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:43:51 det de33 system HCPDTS143E DASD DE33 in use by system Ready(00143); T=0.01/0.01 11:43:54 q sys de33

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Marcy Cortes
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Can't detach a DASD device from system Try HALT DE33 ... JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Sustaining Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Marcy Cortes Sent: Sun 9/14/2008 12:53 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system halt de33 Halt was not initiated

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Marcy Cortes
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Quay, Jonathan (IHG) Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:05 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Can't detach a DASD device from system I think, but am not sure, that if you have done a DEFINE MDISK against that volume somewhere along the way, that you see

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 09/14/2008 at 12:53 EDT, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: halt de33 Halt was not initiated to DASD DE33 because the device is not active Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:51:49 Nope. It's very odd. I was taking 17 volumes off, and only this one got stuck... Great. LOGOFF/FORCE

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Scott Rohling
PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system halt de33 Halt was not initiated to DASD DE33 because the device is not active Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:51:49 Nope. It's very odd. I was taking 17 volumes off, and only this one got stuck... Marcy

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Scott Rohling
Silly me - it would have shown up as CPOWN when you did the Q DE33 -- never mind :-) Scott On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Scott Rohling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hmm.. Since it's showing 0 users -- maybe it's in the CPOWN list? Q CPOWN... Scott Rohling

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Scott Rohling
No - DEF MDISK will not show 0 users - I just tested against an unused volume on our system and it shows 1 user using the volume now... Scott On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think, but am not sure, that if you have done a DEFINE MDISK against

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
Did you do it as a full pack i.e. 0 END? From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Scott Rohling Sent: Sun 9/14/2008 1:22 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system No - DEF MDISK will not show 0 users - I just

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Scott Rohling
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system No - DEF MDISK will not show 0 users - I just tested against an unused volume on our system and it shows 1 user using the volume now... Scott On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Can't detach a DASD device from system

2008-09-14 Thread Marcy Cortes
10:17 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Can't detach a DASD device from system On Sunday, 09/14/2008 at 12:53 EDT, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: halt de33 Halt was not initiated to DASD DE33 because the device is not active Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:51:49 Nope. It's