No, it was a real mini disk formated as SWAP
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dave
Jones [d...@vsoft-software.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
That's
I am getting the following -
dirm for ewsauto1 get
DVHXMT1191I Your GET request has been sent for processing.
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:32:10
DVHREQ2288I Your GET request for EWSAUTO1 at * has been accepted.
DVHLOC3602E Directory entry EWSAUTO1 has active device locks against it.
DVHLOC3602E
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Device locks
I am getting the following -
dirm for ewsauto1 get
DVHXMT1191I Your GET request has been sent for processing.
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:32:10
DVHREQ2288I Your GET request for EWSAUTO1 at * has been accepted.
DVHLOC3602E Directory entry
can't you issue a DIRM unlock
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:09:40 -0700
From: david.wak...@infocrossing.com
Subject: Re: Device locks
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
There is a DELETE LOCK command
that will probably rectify the situation. But the question that bothers me is:
how/why did
Sorry, I made an error - I showed you the SFS DLETE LOCK - not the
DIRMAINT UNLOCK. My error.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of clifford jackson
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
can't
= 3601.
Eric Spencer
p:512.241.7313 | f:512.343.9538
Neon Enterprise Software LLC.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of clifford jackson
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
can't you issue a DIRM
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of clifford jackson
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
can't you issue a DIRM unlock
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:09:40 -0700
From: david.wak
LLC.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
Eric,
you need to find out what virtual address in the directory entry
PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
can't you issue a DIRM unlock
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:09:40 -0700
From: david.wak...@infocrossing.com
Subject: Re: Device locks
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
There is a DELETE LOCK command
, May 17, 2010 1:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
Eric,
you need to find out what virtual address in the directory entry is
locked and then use the DIRM FOR EWSAUTO1 UNOCKvaddr command.
DJ
On 05/17/2010 01:25 PM, Eric Spencer wrote:
I tried that first (DIRM
...@listserv.uark.edu]
On Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Device locks
Eric,
you need to find out what virtual address in the directory
entry is
locked and then use the DIRM FOR EWSAUTO1 UNOCKvaddr command.
DJ
On 05/17
11 matches
Mail list logo