Yes.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:03 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Driver 67
This weekend our CE installed Driver 67 on our z9 and the operator
console
log shows
This weekend our CE installed Driver 67 on our z9 and the operator consol
e
log shows message HCPSAS879I CPU Installed Facilities have changed at
that time. After that time I no longer get any statistics from the other
LPARs on the ESALPARS screen/reports. Does VM need to re-IPL'd to start
That looks like it. It was added to the 2096DEVICE and ZVM530 subsets
10/29/07. Unfortunately, I retrived those subsets a few days earlier
(10/25/07).
The only info I got from the IBM CE regarding Driver 67 was that z/VM 5.2
required maintanence to avoid a crash but that z/VM 5.3
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Driver 67
On Feb 11, 2008 5:08 PM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could it be VM64323?
http
On Feb 11, 2008 5:08 PM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be VM64323?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/redalert/
Thanks Marcy. I knew there as a problem where z/VM forgot it was
running in LPAR, but I could not find the APAR number... This
certainly explains why ESALPAR and ESALPARS
cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:03 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Driver 67
This weekend our CE installed Driver 67 on our z9 and the operator consol=
e
log
On Monday, 02/11/2008 at 12:53 EST, Brian Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That looks like it. It was added to the 2096DEVICE and ZVM530 subsets
10/29/07. Unfortunately, I retrived those subsets a few days earlier
(10/25/07).
The only info I got from the IBM CE regarding Driver 67
