Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-13 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 09/13/2006 at 10:25 CDT, Ron Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only type of link we have been having > problems with is TCP/IP. Also ,there are 2 or 3 other CTC links between > the specific LPARs involved here and they are working successfully. > We've even taken the same CTC p

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-13 Thread David Boyes
> >Perhaps the problem is that chpid 2 and 3 are not connected to each > other? > > I would suggest looking at "Defining ESCON CTCs Between LPARs" by Shimon > >Lebowitz at http://www.sinenomine.net/system/files?file=ectcpsb.pdf. URL http://www.sinenomine.net/node/465 will give you some options on

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-13 Thread Ron Greve
>> If not, what are we not seeing? > >Perhaps the problem is that chpid 2 and 3 are not connected to each other? > I would suggest looking at "Defining ESCON CTCs Between LPARs" by Shimon >Lebowitz at http://www.sinenomine.net/system/files?file=ectcpsb.pdf. You >can accomplish what you want with o

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 09/12/2006 at 03:52 CDT, Ron Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan > > Ok, I think I'm looping here ;-) That's ok, I just started paying attention, so we're even! > First, how does this statement from the TCPIP Planning and Config > quide relate to how I define the IOCP statemen

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 15:52 -0500, Ron Greve wrote: > Alan > > Ok, I think I'm looping here ;-) > > Two questions. > > First, how does this statement from the TCPIP Planning and Config > quide relate to how I define the IOCP statements? > > >***

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread Ron Greve
Alan Ok, I think I'm looping here ;-) Two questions. First, how does this statement from the TCPIP Planning and Config quide relate to how I define the IOCP statements? >** > >maybe it's 'cause you are trying to attach ctc an

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 09/12/2006 at 11:53 CDT, Ron Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since we had RSCS, VTAM and JES working with SCTC device/links > we thought these links would also work with TCP/IP. (and it sounds > like it would have if we were talking from Z/OS TCP/IP to Linux TCP/IP) > > What I t

Re: FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread Ron Greve
>CHPID PATH=3D(BB),TYPE=3DCTC,SWITCH=3D01 > >CNTLUNIT >CUNUMBR=3DBB10,PATH=3DBB,LINK=3DFA,UNIT=3DSCTC,UNITADD=3D((10,16)) > >IODEVICE ADDRESS=3D(BB10,16),CUNUMBR=3DBB10,UNIT=3DSCTC,UNITADD=3D10 > >In HCD, the corresponding CHPIDs are defined as CNC, the Control Units >as SCTC,

FW: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

2006-09-12 Thread HARROP, Roy
We have two CTCs between an old VM/ESA system and an even older OS/390 system running on separate physical processors. One of the CTCs connects the TCP/IP's on these systems and the other connects VM's RSCS to OS/390's JES2. The relevant bit of the VM IOCDS: CHPID PATH=(BB),TYPE=CTC,SWITCH=01