Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-28 Thread Barton Robinson
remember the numbers). Regards Tom -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Barton Robinson Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 6:03 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization CMM-1 is almost always

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-28 Thread Sterling James
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization The Q3 issue is likely a websphere polling issue that Rob is working with WAS development on. The solution to that currently leads back to using CMM1 as well. Will call

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-28 Thread Barton Robinson
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 08/28/2009 12:03 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization The Q3 issue is likely a websphere polling issue that Rob is working

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-28 Thread Paul, Thomas
Thank you!! My point exactly! -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Barton Robinson Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:12 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization I am NOT inferring using VMRM

Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Paul, Thomas
I am working on the following and wonder whether anyone had done this before or help me to figure out the best way. 1. z/VM Customization - The idea is to have a single VM/SES copy acoross LPARS and have small spool space for NSS/DCSS (the backup is done by FDR in z/OS) in the SYSRES/LPAR.

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Mark Post
On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com wrote: -snip- 2. Linux Sizing - All Linux guests are independent - in other words, they all have their own Kernel, etc. The idea is to build an NSS and make it like a CMS user. So, if I accomplish that what would be the size of

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Paul, Thomas
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com wrote: -snip- 2. Linux Sizing - All Linux guests are independent - in other words, they all have their own Kernel, etc. The idea is to build an NSS and make it like

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Barton Robinson
Tom -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 08/27/2009 at 04:20 EDT, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com wrote: 1M is nothing to brag about. ?? That's 1MB per Linux guest. So the savings depends on the number of guests. The effect of those savings on overall system performance depends on the ratio of supply vs. demand on

Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization

2009-08-27 Thread Paul, Thomas
:03 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization CMM-1 is almost always appropriate (SLES9, SLES10, RHEL4, RHEL5). CMMA is NOT. CMM1 is recommended, CMMA is not. Mark is right on the numbers. Paul, Thomas wrote: Hi Mark, CMM is not applicable here because