remember the numbers).
Regards
Tom
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 6:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
CMM-1 is almost always
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
The Q3 issue is likely a websphere polling issue that Rob is working
with WAS development on. The solution to that currently leads back to
using CMM1 as well. Will call
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
08/28/2009 12:03 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
The Q3 issue is likely a websphere polling issue that Rob is working
Thank you!! My point exactly!
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
I am NOT inferring using VMRM
I am working on the following and wonder whether anyone had done this
before or help me to figure out the best way.
1. z/VM Customization - The idea is to have a single VM/SES copy acoross
LPARS and have small spool space for NSS/DCSS (the backup is done by FDR
in
z/OS) in the SYSRES/LPAR.
On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com wrote:
-snip-
2. Linux Sizing - All Linux guests are independent - in other words, they
all have their own Kernel, etc. The idea is to build an NSS and make it
like a CMS user. So, if I accomplish that what would be the size of
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com
wrote:
-snip-
2. Linux Sizing - All Linux guests are independent - in other words,
they
all have their own Kernel, etc. The idea is to build an NSS and make
it
like
Tom
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
On 8/27/2009 at 10:26 AM, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com
On Thursday, 08/27/2009 at 04:20 EDT, Paul, Thomas thomas.p...@iso.com
wrote:
1M is nothing to brag about.
?? That's 1MB per Linux guest. So the savings depends on the number of
guests. The effect of those savings on overall system performance depends
on the ratio of supply vs. demand on
:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Sizing z/VM Customization
CMM-1 is almost always appropriate (SLES9, SLES10, RHEL4, RHEL5). CMMA
is NOT. CMM1 is recommended, CMMA is not. Mark is right on the
numbers.
Paul, Thomas wrote:
Hi Mark,
CMM is not applicable here because
10 matches
Mail list logo