Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-06 Thread Schuh, Richard
Not multiple stacks, multiple sockets on one port, one stack. The application is a driver of test systems that opens thousands of sockets, one for each endpoint that it emulates. Since it is one IUCV connection, my MAXCONN is not in danger of being exceeded. Regards, Richard Schuh

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-05 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 10/05/2008 at 04:55 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From what I see, IPGATE can only talk to one single stack, so it makes > sense to use a single connection. I have never used RXSOCKET, but from > what I see it does not support multiple stacks either, so it is > pra

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-05 Thread Ivica Brodaric
s he said that he has the control of the EXEC that creates the sockets, I presume that he would know how those sockets are opened. IPGATE does open an IUCV connection for each local resource, but those connections count towards IPGATE server machine's MAXCONN number, not the TCPIP machine&#x

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-05 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Ivica Brodaric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For applications, check IPGATE if you have it. It does only one > socket('INITIALIZE') in the top level routine, but creates new sockets for > each userid/APPC resource pair. According to previous post, it should use > onl

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-04 Thread Ivica Brodaric
If you are worried about MAXCONN in general, RSCS LPR links use one IUCV link to the stack each. For applications, check IPGATE if you have it. It does only one socket('INITIALIZE') in the top level routine, but creates new sockets for each userid/APPC resource pair. According to previou

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-03 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 10/03/2008 at 03:52 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A single IUCV connection handles multiple sockets. > > But your average application may not do that and could also establish > multiple

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-03 Thread Schuh, Richard
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: MAXCONN > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Alan Altmark > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A single IUCV connection handles multiple sockets. > > But your average application may not do that and could also > esta

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-03 Thread Schuh, Richard
U > Subject: Re: MAXCONN > > On Thursday, 10/02/2008 at 12:20 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > What consumes the connections specified in the MAXCONN option of the > TCPIP > > machine's directory? Does each open socket consume

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-03 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A single IUCV connection handles multiple sockets. But your average application may not do that and could also establish multiple connections to the same stack, right? >From the VMDBK you follow the VMDIUCVB pointer to the

Re: MAXCONN

2008-10-03 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/02/2008 at 12:20 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What consumes the connections specified in the MAXCONN option of the TCPIP > machine's directory? Does each open socket consume 1 connection, or is it 1 > connection for each gues

MAXCONN

2008-10-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
What consumes the connections specified in the MAXCONN option of the TCPIP machine's directory? Does each open socket consume 1 connection, or is it 1 connection for each guest that opens 1 or more sockets? Regards, Richard Schuh