Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Tom Duerbusch
l Message- From: Rob van der Heij Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:02:29 To: Subject: Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Alain Benveniste wrote: > > The z/VM has no expanded storage defined. You're right on this ! > The problem revealed by

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Alain Benveniste wrote: > > The z/VM has no expanded storage defined. You're right on this ! > The problem revealed by the users just tickle my mind in the fact that : > could it be possible that is has nothing to see with my config but rather > with the 3270 emu

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
z/OS? How'd they run? Marcy From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alain Benveniste Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:37 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM The z

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM The z/VM has no expanded storage defined. You're right on this ! The problem revealed by the users just tickle my mind in the fact that : could it be possible that is has nothing to see with my config but rather with the 3270 emulator or something aroun

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
ain Benveniste ---06/17/2010 11:08:57 AM---Marcy The sizes of those zOS > under z/VM are exactly the sizes they have in lpar at home... > > > From: > Alain Benveniste > > To: > IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > Date: > 06/17/2010 11:08 AM > > Subject:

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
; Alain Benveniste > > To: > IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > Date: > 06/17/2010 11:08 AM > > Subject: > Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM > > Sent by: > The IBM z/VM Operating System > > > > Marcy > > The sizes of those zOS

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
> your cooperation." > > > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Alain Benveniste > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:09 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Jonathan R Nolting
:Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System Marcy The sizes of those zOS under z/VM are

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
Of Alain Benveniste Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:09 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM Marcy The sizes of those zOS under z/VM are exactly the sizes they have in lpar at home... Alain Le 17 juin 2010 à 19:23, Marcy Cortes a écrit : &g

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
0 9:54 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM > > Back from a DR test, the feedback I have from users is that a simple 'ent= > er' > on z/OS generate a xSYSTEM, short for me, but really embarassing for the > users... >

Re: Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
] On Behalf Of Alain Benveniste Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:54 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM Back from a DR test, the feedback I have from users is that a simple 'ent= er' on z/OS generate a xSYSTEM, short for me, but really embarassing

Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM

2010-06-17 Thread Alain Benveniste
Back from a DR test, the feedback I have from users is that a simple 'ent er' on z/OS generate a xSYSTEM, short for me, but really embarassing for the users... We run a zVM530 with 8 zOS in 1.8 as guest, 20G real storage, 4000mips. A ll the DASD are defined as MDISK with MW. I gave access to the 8