CTED]>
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:17:00 +
> Subject: OT:I/O in Emulated Mainframes (Was Re: PSI
> story)
>
> --- "Jeff Gribbin, EDS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > With a small amount of trepidation (but inviting
quot;Dave Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:17:00 +0000
> Subject: OT:I/O in Emulated Mainframes (Was Re: PSI
> story)
>
> --- "Jeff Gribbin, EDS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > With a small amount of
Hey Dave -
(Also speaking for myself) I agree with you in part. But add 100 users to a PC
and watch what happens to the IO. Or add a heavily used database with a few
hundred users. PC Servers just do not scale in terms of I/O the same way. iSCSI
and other technologies are starting to change that
--- "Jeff Gribbin, EDS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a small amount of trepidation (but inviting
> stomping from anybody who
> feels that I'm off-base here) can I remind folk
> that, on IBM mainframe
> hardware, MIPS aren't the whole story. There's
> channels too - and in an
> I/O-related