We have z/VM5.3, with an IBM 3494 tape library system running RMSMASTER
(DFSMS), AND DYNAM. We are doing a stacked DDR tape switch 4 volumes on it.
On the 4th tape we get:
Tape 0590 given to DYNAMVM 0590
11:25:33 CADT822I DSN=DDR.XX.530W02.3 IS FILE NO. 3 THERE ARE ONLY 1 FILES
ON TAPE
On Friday, 05/02/2008 at 12:06 EDT, Jan Canavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What we get on the previous volumes are:
Tape 0590 given to DYNAMVM 0590
Tape 0181 attached
11:22:13 CADT831I *CLOSED* DDRWKLY 0590 050094 DDR.XX.530W01.2
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 01:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
On Friday, 05/02/2008 at 12:06 EDT, Jan Canavan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What we get on the previous volumes
On Friday, 05/02/2008 at 01:39 EDT, Imler, Steven J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been waiting for another report of a failure from the customer
after providing them with some trace diagnostics ... but as far as I
know there hasn't been another failure (because I haven't heard anything
back
I bet because the code was written before multiuser attach support existed.
Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
Curious as to why a tape give is issued here rather than exploiting
the multiuser attach support in RMS
Best Regards,
Les Geer
IBM z/VM and Linux Development
--
Stephen Frazier
: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
I bet because the code was written before multiuser attach
support existed.
Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
Curious as to why a tape give is issued here rather than
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
I bet because the code was written before multiuser attach support existed.
Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
Curious as to why a tape give is issued here rather than exploiting
the multiuser attach support in RMS
Best
On May 2, 2008, at 6:01 PM, David Boyes wrote:
And of course it could be updated, but they probably have to weigh
the
cost vs other new things that development could be doing. So goes
the
Song of Chuckie... ;-)
Or the Ballad of Chuckie (if old Sam Coleridge wants a footnote for
this,
And of course it could be updated, but they probably have to weigh the
cost vs other new things that development could be doing. So goes the
Song of Chuckie... ;-)
Or the Ballad of Chuckie (if old Sam Coleridge wants a footnote for
this, he's a loonie):
In Endicott did Mom Watson's boy
A
I'm not sure whether you need:
a) MORE LAUDANUM
or
b) Urgent visit from A Person From Porlock
Unfortunately, I'd have to deceive someone important again. He's
watching this time.
(and people ask me what a good liberal education is good for...)
Subject: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
We have z/VM5.3, with an IBM 3494 tape library system
running RMSMASTER
(DFSMS), AND DYNAM. We are doing a stacked DDR tape switch 4
volumes on it.
On the 4th tape we get:
Tape 0590 given to DYNAMVM 0590
11:25:33 CADT822I
, May 02, 2008 06:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
I bet because the code was written before multiuser attach
support existed.
Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
Curious as to why a tape give is issued here rather than exploiting
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
And of course it could be updated, but they probably have to
weigh the cost vs other new things that development could be
doing. So goes the Song of Chuckie... ;-)
Mike Walter
- Original
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
And of course it could be updated, but they probably have to
weigh the cost vs other new things that development could be
doing. So goes the Song of Chuckie... ;-)
Mike Walter
- Original
/02/2008 09:09 PM AST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
Not to beat the dead horse ... but Mike is correct in assuming that
Dynam/T VM does not currently have support for MULTIUSER ATTACH or
recognition of it.
For those on the list that run
]
Sent: 05/02/2008 10:03 PM AST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with stacked ddr tape and possible DYNAM
And yes ... Chuckie beat me to a pulp and gave my initial response to
Jan (or at least part of it) ... Apologies ... Apologies ... Apologies
...
-Original Message-
From
16 matches
Mail list logo
