Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
Subject: Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD On 1/4/07, Jim Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my experience with compiling REXX my initial response would be no you would not see much (if any) benefit. There are two general reasons for compiling a REXX routine: to hide the contents from the casual

REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Don Russell
Is there any performance benefit to compiling a REXX EXEC if it will be EXECLOAD'd for the lifetime of it's use? For example, I have a service machine which, upon startup, EXECLOADs some EXECs it needs over and over. It/they remain EXECLOADd until the service machine is shutdown. The EXEC is

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Kris Buelens
EXECLOAD simply loads it, so it saves on I/O, no more no less, no tokenization like what happens on OS/2. Compliling will save CPU cycles, but the compiled exec is larger, hence EXECLOAD of a compiled exec is even more recommended. 2007/1/4, Don Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there any

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Jim Vincent
In my experience with compiling REXX my initial response would be no you would not see much (if any) benefit. There are two general reasons for compiling a REXX routine: to hide the contents from the casual observer or to improve performance when the logic does a lot of repetitive things (code

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Wayne T Smith
Oh yes! EXECLOAD simply loads a file into storage. If you display memory, you'll see the source (compiled or non-compiled data directly from your file) ... and that's what is interpreted when you run the non-compiled EXEC or run directly from a compiled EXEC. If you see a performance

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 01/04/2007 at 11:12 PST, Don Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any performance benefit to compiling a REXX EXEC if it will be EXECLOAD'd for the lifetime of it's use? For example, I have a service machine which, upon startup, EXECLOADs some EXECs it needs over and over.

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
compiling / EXECLOAD Oh yes! EXECLOAD simply loads a file into storage. If you display memory, you'll see the source (compiled or non-compiled data directly from your file) ... and that's what is interpreted when you run the non-compiled EXEC or run directly from a compiled EXEC. If you see

Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD

2007-01-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:35 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: REXX compiling / EXECLOAD On Thursday, 01/04/2007 at 11:12 PST, Don Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote