On 12/29/06, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
location attached to our mainframe. We are talking about 1 thousand of
miles. Speed is not important
Also makes a difference what you want to do with it (yeah, know it
Message-
From: Stracka, James (GTI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 January 2007 13:57
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote Tape drives
We used a vendor and the for this. Pay attention to MITIME setting for
those drives.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM
and at the agreed
speeds.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:02 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote Tape drives
January 2007 14:08
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote Tape drives
Crispin,
My mind and fingers were running in different directions at different
speeds.
We used an outside vendor for our remote tape drives. Make sure you pay
attention to the MITIME setting for drives and your
There are lots of ways to do that, depending upon what it is attached to and
what (if any) budget you have to do it with. Some more details would help get
you better suggestions. : )
-Paul
---BeginMessage---
Chaps,
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
location
On Friday, 12/29/2006 at 06:16 GMT, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
location
attached to our mainframe. We are talking about 1 thousand of miles.
Speed is
not important
Speed is *always* important. :-) There
There are channel extension boxes that will do this. McData is one
vendor that comes to mind, but I'm sure there are others.
Dennis
I'll tell you a secret: When your number comes up, you're going to go.
Well, every morning I get up, I change
