Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Ivica Brodaric
To speed things up, you may also define primary and secondary pairs before you run ICKDSF with ERASEDATA. That will ease the load on the channels (or halve the time required to erase everything) and make the subsystem do extra work for you. Then maybe break the pairs, swap the primaries and

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Ivica Brodaric
Then maybe break the pairs, swap the primaries and secondaries and rerun the erase. To be clear, break the pairs only after they are fully synced. Ivica

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Ivica Brodaric
A process like rewriting data with different patterns is modeled after traditional technology. We know at least of some DASD subsystems where the remaining 24 rewrites would not cause writing at the same location on a disk, and thus not achieve what you meant to do. Those funny patterns tend

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:50 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Shark Retiring On Monday, 12/08/2008 at 01:53 EST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only 6? In 1968, I saw a report that stated that the folks at installation code CAD could read

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 12/09/2008 at 04:21 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would hope the DASD subsystem also has some facility that implements what's required in the device to wipe out data. I've got calls into Storage people to tell me where The Documentation is on how to decommission

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:35 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Shark Retiring On Tuesday, 12/09/2008 at 04:21 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would

Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Mary Zervos
We are about to retire a 2105-F20 Shark, which will be resold. The best way to totally delete all our data from the Shark? Thanks, Mary Zervos Systems Programmer Binghamton University

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread McBride, Catherine
Check with your IBM C.E., they have the good stuff. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mary Zervos Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:52 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Shark Retiring We are about to retire a 2105-F20 Shark

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Aria Bamdad
You can try using ICKDSF and write patterns of data on it to clear what was there. This may not be good enough for some organizations but is good enough for most. You can try something like the following: TRKFMT UNIT(xxx) NVFY ERASEDATA CYLRANGE(,) CYCLES(x) Aria. On Mon, 8 Dec 2008

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Shark Retiring You can try using ICKDSF and write patterns of data on it to clear what was there. This may not be good enough for some organizations but is good enough for most. You can try something like the following: TRKFMT UNIT(xxx) NVFY ERASEDATA CYLRANGE(,) CYCLES

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Peter . Webb
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Shark Retiring What would be the minimum acceptable value for CYCLES(x) to ensure data was not retrievable? From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aria Bamdad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Alain Benveniste
Mary, TRKFMT is very slow process. We have to wipe out our DR site at each test. Cycle for us is 3. To do that I have developped something around DUPLICATE HiDRO cmd. The idea is to TRKFMT volume A, B and C (3 cycles). Then we duplicate A to A', B to B' and C to C' and again A to A, A to B and C

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Kris Buelens
With a small change to my BUSERVER, ICKDSF TRKFMT commands could be dispatched to 1 to 99 worker machines. 2008/12/8 Alain Benveniste [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mary, TRKFMT is very slow process. We have to wipe out our DR site at each test. Cycle for us is 3. To do that I have developped something

Re: Shark Retiring

2008-12-08 Thread Ivica Brodaric
On Mac OS X's Disk Utility there are Secure Erase Options and under a 7-Pass Erase it says that it meets the US Department of Defense 5220-22 M standard for securely erasing magnetic media. There is also a 35-Pass Erase option with no standard attached to it. I always wondered why is it there...