On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Fred Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah, I got it to work by changing...
>
> spec ws = fs . substr f2 of w1 1.10 r 1-* n | sort 1.10 | substr 11-*
Right. The "substr" stage is fairly new. It's a bit cheaper than a
full "spec" stage. A popular alternative in t
Centre Services (DCS)
Northern Territory Government, Australia
- Forwarded by Fred Schmidt/DCIS/NTG on 06/05/2008 04:20 PM -
Fred Schmidt/DCIS/NTG
06/05/2008 04:05 PM
To
IBMVM List
cc
Subject
Re: Sorting output from PIPE REXXVARS TOLOAD for dumping a stem variable
On Mon, 05 May 2008
On Mon, 05 May 2008 22:54:23 -0700, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>What you do is you add an extra field to the record to sort them on,
>and then drop that extra field again. Like this:
>spec ws = fs . substr f2 of w1 1.10 r 1-* n | sort 1.10 | substr 11-*
Thanks Rob,
Is SUBSTR something I need to get
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Fred Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >PIPE rexxvars TOLOAD | pick 2.6 == /TABLE./ | sort | ...
>
> This, and the other proposed solutions to dumping stem variables' contents,
> do not sort the values correctly if there are more than 9 values. Eg:...
What you
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:45:36 -0800, Alan Ackerman wrote: (Was Re:
Another PIPE how to)
>REXXVARS TOLOAD produces strings like /TABLE.0101/value -- only there is
>no guarantee that
>the delimiter will be a slash. So instead, I always use:
>
>PIPE rexxvars TOLOAD | pick 2.6 == /TABLE./ | ...
>
