Berry,
No, there's no logic in the TCP/IP stack to reduce the size of the buffers
once they've been expanded. It would be nice though...
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 06/22/2007
03:40:44 PM:
Hello Alan,
That
Hello Alan,
That would get me to a question, are buffers that are dynamically extende
d
automatically reduced once they're no longer needed? As you state, more
buffers could have impact for other users. So suppose we would have a sud
den
need for larger buffers to perform some action. If the
Hello.
We are running z/VM 4.4 and since initial installation no problem arises.
This week, we started to receive following messages:
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP is low on TCBs. Of 256 blocks, 24 are free. You should
monitor this.
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP was very low on TCP connections. Of 341
Carlos--I ran into that a few years ago. I'm running with:
ACBPOOLSIZE 1700
SCBPOOLSIZE 1700
TCBPOOLSIZE 2200
FIXEDPAGESTORAGEPOOL1500
These are sort of a SWAG. Altho I did have to go back and increase some
of them after the initial
On Friday, 06/22/2007 at 11:50 ZW3, Carlos Bodra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP was very low on TCP connections. Of 285 blocks, 41 are
free
after 85 more allocated.
These messages occur with differences of some days. In TCPIP PROFILE
file we
have only
