Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-05 Thread Les Koehler
_ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:45 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages You might try 'WAKEUP RESET' just before you do the 'WAKEUP +0 (IUCVMSG' (Yo

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Harding
27;)>0 then do_me = '*' Else do_me = '' Parse value DiagRc(8,'Q SECUSER *'), with . '15'x . '15'x suinfo '15'x Parse var suinfo . whoisit . If whoisit<>'not' then Parse value DiagRc(8,'SET SECUSER

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Harding
TSERV.UARK.EDU > Date: 08/04/2011 10:44 AM > Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > There's nothing wrong at all with that Pipe. I *love* Pipes, > feeling that a day without Pipes is a day without sunshine. > > But there's a

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Rohling
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Scott Rohling > *Sent:* Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:55 AM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: Trapping SMSG messages > > > ** ** > > Another couple of points -- > > ** ** > > - Since

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Mike Walter
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages What's wrong with the PIPE method: "PIPE LITER

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
ers Jr. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Walter Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:02 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages Unrelated to the reported problem, but a simpler/cheaper way

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
ystem [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:55 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages Another couple of points -- - Since you can't control who might send a message to you when - you probably want to loop u

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Mike Walter
on The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:45 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Trapping SMSG messages Try turning the '

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Rohling
Another couple of points -- - Since you can't control who might send a message to you when - you probably want to loop until there are no more rc=5.It could be a msg from another user is stacked in IUCV. - DESBUF is kind of brute force -- it wipes out the stack -- and there could conceivably

Re: Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Rohling
Try turning the 'SET MSG IUCV' to 'WAKEUP +0 (IUCVMSG' .. I think this gets WAKEUP ready - and also issues the SET MSG IUCV. The example under 'HELP WAKEUP' shows it done this way and I seem to recall needing to do it in something I'd written. Scott Rohling On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Fra

Trapping SMSG messages

2011-08-04 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
I don't quite understand why I'm missing the first IUCV MSG sent to my virtual machine after an IPL. The basics of this program is: 1) Send a SMSG to VMUTIL of 'RUOKAY' 2) VMUTIL, if alive, will send back a MSG response "IMOKAY" 3) If th