I opened a SHARE requirement for a change in VSWITCH authorization
(implicit authorization I guess is what Alan called it :)
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must
I haven't really thought this thru, but how about something like this
in the VSWITCH start-up
or config file an unrestrict parm that could be generic, ie UNRESTRICT
VSE* ZOS* then just
machines with those prefixes would be unrestricted ???
I'd settle for the current behavior we have with
Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this
nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries:
COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT USERID
I believe the devices get created BEFORE the command occurs. So the NICDEF
happens, does NOT get
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 03:55 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 3:36 AM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this
nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries:
COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1
On Dec 7, 2007 12:44 PM, Michael MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
silly double authentication schemes that don't do anything
But Rob implies this *doesn't* work?
Try adding an explicit COUPLE *after* the GRANT.
And Phil implies it *can* work?
Now I'm confused.
It was the other way
On Dec 7, 2007 3:36 AM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this
nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries:
COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT USERID
Haha. :-) Now you did it. I cannot get this picture out of my mind
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 12:19 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Consistency in treating every animal as if it were a pony may be
simple, but still not a good idea.
When the resource is owned by another user, then it is appropriate
that the other user can control access (so the
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 03:10 EST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't really thought this thru, but how about something like this in
the
VSWITCH start-up or config file an unrestrict parm that could be
generic, ie
UNRESTRICT VSE* ZOS* then just machines with those prefixes
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 1:59 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH bug ?
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 02:31 EST, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ding ding! We have a winner!
Thanks Phil (yet again).
The explicit
On Dec 7, 2007 5:08 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my philosophy that directory entries are *desired* configurations.
If authorization has not been given to achieve that, so be it. If the
person setting up the directory entry also has authority to confer
authority upon
for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:34 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ?
Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll never forget
, December 07, 2007 11:59 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ?
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 02:31 EST, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ding ding! We have a winner!
Thanks Phil (yet again).
The explicit couple in another COMMAND solved that.
(but yeah, in my copious spare
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702.
I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) - runing on a virtual machine
I take it down.
Rename it (using directory manager of my choice -- in this case
'vmsecure change linuxa linuxb')
Boot virtual machine with the new name
And Get...
qeth: Device
Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ?
That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I am building a new linux
server. I wish the it would accept a wild card format userid like lnx* .
/Tom Kern
Marcy Cortes wrote:
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702.
I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) -
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 6:06 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ?
Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ?
That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I
] VSWITCH bug ?
Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ?
That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I am building a new linux
server. I wish the it would accept a wild card format userid like lnx* .
/Tom Kern
Marcy Cortes wrote:
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702.
I have a Linux (sles9x
On Thursday, 12/06/2007 at 07:26 EST, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702.
I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) - runing on a virtual machine
I take it down.
Rename it (using directory manager of my choice -- in this case
'vmsecure
change linuxa linuxb')
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ?
On Thursday, 12/06/2007 at 07:26 EST, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702.
I have a Linux (sles9x
18 matches
Mail list logo