Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-10 Thread Marcy Cortes
I opened a SHARE requirement for a change in VSWITCH authorization (implicit authorization I guess is what Alan called it :) Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-08 Thread David Boyes
I haven't really thought this thru, but how about something like this in the VSWITCH start-up or config file an unrestrict parm that could be generic, ie UNRESTRICT VSE* ZOS* then just machines with those prefixes would be unrestricted ??? I'd settle for the current behavior we have with

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Phil Smith III
Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries: COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT USERID I believe the devices get created BEFORE the command occurs. So the NICDEF happens, does NOT get

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 03:55 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 7, 2007 3:36 AM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries: COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Dec 7, 2007 12:44 PM, Michael MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: silly double authentication schemes that don't do anything But Rob implies this *doesn't* work? Try adding an explicit COUPLE *after* the GRANT. And Phil implies it *can* work? Now I'm confused. It was the other way

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Dec 7, 2007 3:36 AM, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll never forget it again like I've done before because I have this nifty z/VM 5.3 feature in my directory entries: COMMAND SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT USERID Haha. :-) Now you did it. I cannot get this picture out of my mind

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 12:19 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Consistency in treating every animal as if it were a pony may be simple, but still not a good idea. When the resource is owned by another user, then it is appropriate that the other user can control access (so the

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 03:10 EST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't really thought this thru, but how about something like this in the VSWITCH start-up or config file an unrestrict parm that could be generic, ie UNRESTRICT VSE* ZOS* then just machines with those prefixes

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Huegel, Thomas
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 1:59 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: VSWITCH bug ? On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 02:31 EST, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ding ding! We have a winner! Thanks Phil (yet again). The explicit

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Dec 7, 2007 5:08 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my philosophy that directory entries are *desired* configurations. If authorization has not been given to achieve that, so be it. If the person setting up the directory entry also has authority to confer authority upon

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Marcy Cortes
for your cooperation. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:34 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ? Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll never forget

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-07 Thread Marcy Cortes
, December 07, 2007 11:59 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ? On Friday, 12/07/2007 at 02:31 EST, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ding ding! We have a winner! Thanks Phil (yet again). The explicit couple in another COMMAND solved that. (but yeah, in my copious spare

VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Marcy Cortes
Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702. I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) - runing on a virtual machine I take it down. Rename it (using directory manager of my choice -- in this case 'vmsecure change linuxa linuxb') Boot virtual machine with the new name And Get... qeth: Device

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Thomas Kern
Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ? That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I am building a new linux server. I wish the it would accept a wild card format userid like lnx* . /Tom Kern Marcy Cortes wrote: Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702. I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) -

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Marcy Cortes
Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 6:06 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ? Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ? That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Thomas Kern
] VSWITCH bug ? Did you do 'SET VSWITCH TD6VSW1 GRANT LINUXB' ? That is the one I keep forgetting to do when I am building a new linux server. I wish the it would accept a wild card format userid like lnx* . /Tom Kern Marcy Cortes wrote: Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702. I have a Linux (sles9x

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 12/06/2007 at 07:26 EST, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702. I have a Linux (sles9x - latest kernel) - runing on a virtual machine I take it down. Rename it (using directory manager of my choice -- in this case 'vmsecure change linuxa linuxb')

Re: VSWITCH bug ?

2007-12-06 Thread Marcy Cortes
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:44 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VSWITCH bug ? On Thursday, 12/06/2007 at 07:26 EST, Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running z/VM 5.3 - 0702. I have a Linux (sles9x