On Monday, 12/15/2008 at 11:20 EST, "Ian S. Worthington"
wrote:
> The upshot of this is that there isn't a real OSA to enable a vswitch.
>
> But, if I understand Kris' response correctly I should be able to define
a
> guest lan with a qdio nic for z/tpf and another for the tcpip svm,
possibly
s to the outside world?
>
> ian
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:02:17 AM COT
> From: Alan Altmark
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO setup
>
>> On Monday, 12/15/2008 at 12:02 EST, "Ian S. Worthington"
>&
- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:02:17 AM COT
From: Alan Altmark
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO setup
> On Monday, 12/15/2008 at 12:02 EST, "Ian S. Worthington"
> wrote:
>
> > I'm still at a bit of a loss to understa
On Monday, 12/15/2008 at 12:02 EST, "Ian S. Worthington"
wrote:
> I'm still at a bit of a loss to understand how to connect the simulated
OSA-E
> to the real CTC.
Lest I be caught unawares, let me confirm that by "OSA-E" you mean an
OSA-Express in QDIO mode (aka OSD chpid type).
> The only w
t; virtual LAN or vswitch, the later of which requires a physical OSA-E.
>
> Have I understood this correctly, or is there some other way to do this?
>
> Ian
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:03:58 AM COT
> From: Alan Altmark
> To: IBMVM@LIST
later of which requires a physical OSA-E.
Have I understood this correctly, or is there some other way to do this?
Ian
-- Original Message --
Received: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:03:58 AM COT
From: Alan Altmark
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO setup
> On Friday, 12/12/20
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 08:37 EST, Kris Buelens
wrote:
> I'd say you'd need a second pair. Maybe Alan will contradict me: TCP/IP
in VM
> might be able to "forward" the ProxyArp from TPF over its own -probably
> ProxyArped- CTC to the outside world.
When ProxyARP is enabled, VM TCP/IP will a
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Ian S. Worthington
wrote:
> Thanks Kris.
>
> I can't be sure that the other side can support ProxyApp. Is it possible to
> use the existing CTC pair or do I need a second in either case?
Proxyarp is what the router stack does. When someone ask for the IP
address
he other side can support ProxyApp. Is it possible
> to
> use the existing CTC pair or do I need a second in either case?
>
> i
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received:
> From: Kris Buelens
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO setup
>
&
Thanks Kris.
I can't be sure that the other side can support ProxyApp. Is it possible to
use the existing CTC pair or do I need a second in either case?
i
-- Original Message --
Received:
From: Kris Buelens
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO setup
>
You will indeed a second subnet for this guest lan. And, unless you use
ProxyArp, event the CTC to your router TCPIP woild be a -small- subnet on
its own.
If you have only one TPF guest in this VM, it would indeed be easier to have
a second CTC: one couple of CTC devices to TCP/IP VM, another coup
Hi.
We have a VM system with an IP connection to the real world over a CTC.
I need to set up a connection to a vm running z/tpf which requires an osa-e
card. This I believe I can simulate using DEFINE LAN QDIO, DEFINE NIC QDIO,
and COUPLE for a guest lan or DEVICE/LINK for a point-to-point conne
12 matches
Mail list logo
