On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:44 PM, P Szosw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Dean, David (I/S)david_d...@bcbst.com
wrote:
Thank you, the problem however is exactly what you allude to, what size do
they REALLY need to be. IBM is comparing WebSphere RAM needs between AIX,
HELP!
Warning -the below is from an IBM rep, the name removed to protect the
innocent(?). This is a portion of the analysis comparing real (physical)
memory needs for zLinux guests versus AIX. The 2:1 ratio used below (in my
humble opinion) is extreme overkill. I need the experts (you) to
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Virtual vs. Physical Memory in ZVM
HELP!
Warning -the below is from an IBM rep, the name removed to protect the
innocent(?). This is a portion of the analysis comparing real (physical)
memory needs for zLinux guests versus AIX. The 2:1 ratio used below
:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual vs. Physical Memory in ZVM
David,
I don't think anything stated below is wrong.
I would question whether you really need those guests to be 6G. Our WAS 6.1
guests range from 1G-8G, with the majority of them in between 1G and 2G
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual vs. Physical Memory in ZVM
David,
I don't think anything stated below is wrong.
I would question whether you really need those guests to be 6G. Our WAS
6.1 guests range from 1G-8G, with the majority of them in between 1G and
2G.
The overcommittment
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 1:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Virtual vs. Physical Memory in ZVM
Thank you, the problem however is exactly what you allude to, what size do they
REALLY need to be. IBM is comparing WebSphere RAM needs
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Dean, David (I/S)david_d...@bcbst.com wrote:
Thank you, the problem however is exactly what you allude to, what size do
they REALLY need to be. IBM is comparing WebSphere RAM needs between AIX,
Windows, and zLinux. We have historical data that help us
