Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread David Boyes
On 9/23/08 6:15 PM, "Mike Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just on the off chance... > are there any CPUs defined to that LPAR? Check the HMC. Also make sure they didn't accidentally give you a CF engine by mistake. They used to look the same as an IFL on older HMCs, and some people haven't

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
410 786-0386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean, David (I/S) Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:20 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 I get it all the time when the syste

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
CTED] On Behalf Of Dean, David (I/S) Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:20 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 I get it all the time when the system is already running somewhere else. Have you already got it running elsewhere? David Dean Information Sys

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
ting System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 Have you altered your SYSTEM CONFIG and perhaps taken the processor offline by mistake? If so - you can use SALIPL screen to point

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
Rohling Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 Have you altered your SYSTEM CONFIG and perhaps taken the processor offline by mistake? If so - you can use SALIPL screen to point to a previous version of the system config ... Scott

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
2 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 um how much memory is defined? Is there a chance of IPLing in a 2nd level machine to see if instruction simulation masks the problem? David From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Ma

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Scott Rohling
e 9/23/2008 6:09 PM > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [IBMVM] WAIT STATE 9003 > > This is a separate VM LPAR there is no second level. I am running a > 2094-711 (z9) and it is an IFL. > > > > *Thank You,* > > > > *Terry Martin*** > > *Lockheed Martin

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Mike Walter
AIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 09/23/2008 05:09 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: WAIT STATE 9003 This is a separate VM LPAR there is no second level. I am running a 2094-71

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread David Kreuter
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] WAIT STATE 9003 This is a separate VM LPAR there is no second level. I am running a 2094-711 (z9) and it is an IFL. Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Information Technology z/OS & z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning Cell - 443 632-

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
CTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Kreuter Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:05 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: WAIT STATE 9003 what model cpu is it? Does the same CPLOAD MODULE IPL in a 2nd level system? D

Re: WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread David Kreuter
what model cpu is it? Does the same CPLOAD MODULE IPL in a 2nd level system? David From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Tue 9/23/2008 5:45 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] WAIT STATE 9003 Hi

WAIT STATE 9003

2008-09-23 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Hi Here we go again: I am receiving a WAIT STATE 9003 while trying to IPL my test LPAR (VM5.3). I have no idea what/why he is trying to do at this point with the PROCESSOR. Does anyone know a symptom that would cause this wait state? HCP9003W PROCESSOR QUIESCED -- VARY OFFLINE