On Wednesday, 06/21/2006 at 10:15 EST, Ed Zell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003.
> Any chance that this APAR will be fitted back on to z/VM 4.4? It
> would be great to get rid of the copy of TCPIP DATA that is on
> the SMTP machine t
2006 15:13
An: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Betreff: Re: another SMTP question - IPMAILERNAME instead of
IPMAILERADDRESS -
z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003. It adds
two things:
- IPMAILERADDRESS ALL (you no longer need the DNS hack)
- IPMAILERADDRESS hostname (incl. the
> z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003.
> It adds two things:
> - IPMAILERADDRESS ALL (you no longer need the DNS hack)
> - IPMAILERADDRESS hostname (incl. the LIST option)
Any chance that this APAR will be fitted back on to z/VM 4.4? It
would be great to get rid of th
> z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003. It
adds
> two things:
> - IPMAILERADDRESS ALL (you no longer need the DNS hack)
> - IPMAILERADDRESS hostname (incl. the LIST option)
> >-IPMAILERADDRESS-+-+-+-+-ip_address-+---+>
> | | | |
On Wednesday, 06/21/2006 at 06:28 AST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > In the books I cant't find a smt config configuration statement that
> allows me to
> > use ipmailername instead of a ipmaileraddress. Is there a way to do it
> anyhow ???
>
> Not that I know of, or at least not wit
> But our network people advised me, that I should not hardcode the
ip-address and use
> an ip-name instead.
Good advice. It's only been 30 years since the introduction of the DNS;
it's about time we got past hardcoded IP addresses *anywhere*.
> In the books I cant't find a smt config configur
Title: another SMTP question - IPMAILERNAME instead of IPMAILERADDRESS -
hello VMers,
we are sending CMS-files via SMTP to our OUTLOOK mailserver.
I have definied the OUTLOOK mailsever in the SMTP CONFIG with the IPMAILERADDRESS statement.
Everything works fine.
But our network people
