Re: service all status ptf

2011-06-01 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
>That sounds a tad odd to me. There's nothing (after installation) in >DMS/CMS that requires R/W access to any of the CMS system disks. DMS/CMS might not require R/W access, but if the PPF specifies a link mode of MR, that would do it. I have seen a PPF for another product that had an unneces

Re: service all status ptf

2011-06-01 Thread Chip Davis
That sounds a tad odd to me. There's nothing (after installation) in DMS/CMS that requires R/W access to any of the CMS system disks. DMS/CMS is/was a great little lightweight 3270 panel application builder/manager that was 'way easier to use than ISPF, especially with Rexx. I think it would

Re: service all status ptf

2011-06-01 Thread Steve Harman
That is excellent information, many thanks for the education. I am still seeing the problem even though maint has both 190 and 19E linked RO. I took Alan's advice and opened a ticket. It's not yet resolved, but the y think it involves a product DMS/CMS. I don't know what the fix will be b ut I

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Schuh, Richard
On Behalf Of Mike Walter > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:05 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: service all status ptf > > Entirely true, Kris. > > But with our dearth of CMS users (no more than 25 at any > point in time), I just deleted the HELP saved

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Mike Walter
ase respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: service all status ptf Also the 19D disk has a shared segment for the FSTs. But, unlike fro 190 and 19E, there is no message telling you the saved segment is no longer used as the FST'

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Kris Buelens
-save CMS. > > Mike Walter > Aon Corporation > The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's. > > > > Steve Harman > > Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" > 05/26/2011 01:26 PM > Please respond to > "The IBM z/VM Operating S

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Mike Walter
ing System" 05/26/2011 01:26 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: service all status ptf That helped, thanks. I still have the problem if the PTF I query is not found. I only lose the Y-Stat (19E). If the PTF i

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 05/26/2011 at 02:27 EDT, Steve Harman wrote: > That helped, thanks. > > I still have the problem if the PTF I query is not found. I only lose th > e Y-Stat (19E). If the PTF is found, there is no problem. You need to open a PMR. SERVICE does not (is not supposed to) touch your

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Steve Harman
That helped, thanks. I still have the problem if the PTF I query is not found. I only lose th e Y-Stat (19E). If the PTF is found, there is no problem. service all status UM33290VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing started VMFSRV1226I CP (5VMCPR40%CP) PTF UM33290 status:

Re: service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Mike Walter
IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject service all status ptf I've noticed lately that if I use MAINT to query the status of a PTF using the SERVICE ALL STATUS UMx command that it causes this problem for users who then logon: DMSACC724I 19E replaces Y (19

service all status ptf

2011-05-26 Thread Steve Harman
I've noticed lately that if I use MAINT to query the status of a PTF usin g the SERVICE ALL STATUS UMx command that it causes this problem for users who then logon: DMSACC724I 19E replaces Y (19E) DMSACP723I Y (19E) R/O z/VM V5.4.02011-05-26 08:00 DMSWSP100