Re: set conceal

2008-05-19 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 05/19/2008 at 09:50 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > DMS141T indicates that a program, not CMS itself, abended. DMS143T > > indicates a CMS abend, which will load a disabled wait and trig

Re: set conceal

2008-05-19 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DMS141T indicates that a program, not CMS itself, abended. DMS143T > indicates a CMS abend, which will load a disabled wait and trigger a > re-IPL. So my expectations were the problem (as with many performance issues). C

Re: set conceal

2008-05-19 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 05/19/2008 at 08:42 EDT, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob, I think that CONCEAL on acts upon disabled waits, hence CP READs... Correct, as usual, Kris. A VM READ will not trigger CONCEAL processing. DMS141T indicates that a program, not CMS itself, abended. DMS143T in

Re: set conceal

2008-05-19 Thread Kris Buelens
Rob, I think that CONCEAL on acts upon disabled waits, hence CP READs... Kris 2008/5/19, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Friends, Why doesn't my SET CONCEAL do what I expected ? > I have SET CONCEAL ON but when the program gets a program check, it > just drop

set conceal

2008-05-19 Thread Rob van der Heij
Friends, Why doesn't my SET CONCEAL do what I expected ? I have SET CONCEAL ON but when the program gets a program check, it just drops in VM READ after a DMSABE141T and nothing else... Rob