Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-04-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 04/01/2008 at 05:48 EDT, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cp send cp thebadguest sleep -or- cp send cp thebadguest stop Also an excellent use of the CP FOR command. For those not familiar with it, it has a slightly different authorization scheme: 1. If you are the active

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-04-01 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
Jim said: Remember that when the guest has had absolute share set down to 1%, in order to do any trouble shooting, you'll have to boost up the share setting to be able to get on to the guest to diagnose the problem. The looping condition will still most likely be running and you trying to

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-04-01 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
or saving them. Thank you. From: Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/01/2008 02:46 PM Subject: Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ? The goal will be to put the identified guest to 'sleep' until we can evaluate if it is truly causing issues

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-31 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
Thanks to all - I just want to give the guest no or a minimum amount of CPU until we can diagnose what is going on (and in case we attempt to shoot the wrong guest :-) Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering KP-IT Enterprise Engineering

set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
Is there a way to set a z/VM guest that is misbehaving into a state where it gets no service such as a SET SHARE of some flavor? Thx Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering KP-IT Enterprise Engineering 925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail:

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Marcy Cortes
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:40 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] set share to stop a guest from getting service ? Is there a way to set a z/VM guest that is misbehaving into a state where it gets no service such as a SET SHARE of some

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: set share to stop a guest from getting service ? Is there a way to set a z/VM guest that is misbehaving into a state where it gets no service such as a SET SHARE of some flavor? Thx

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Peter . Webb
:40 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: set share to stop a guest from getting service ? Is there a way to set a z/VM guest that is misbehaving into a state where it gets no service such as a SET SHARE of some flavor? Thx Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
to stop a guest from getting service ? Is there a way to set a z/VM guest that is misbehaving into a state where it gets no service such as a SET SHARE of some flavor? Thx Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:48 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ? Lionel, SET SHARE userid RELATIVE 1 LIMITHARD should take it down as low as it can

Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?

2008-03-28 Thread Jim Bohnsack
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:48 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ? =09 =09 Lionel, SET SHARE userid RELATIVE 1 LIMITHARD should take it down as low as it can go