Rick - I love your suggestion - THANK YOU

Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 

Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We're 
here to make lives better." 

I never guess. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. 
Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories 
to suit facts. 
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, 
you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing 
its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and 
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 



From:
Rick Troth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
04/01/2008 02:46 PM
Subject:
Re: set share to stop a guest from getting service ?



> The goal will be to put the identified guest to 'sleep' until we can
> evaluate if it is truly causing issues.   ...

I think I have followed this whole thread,
and I don't seem to recall either of these suggested:

                 cp send cp thebadguest sleep
                  -or-
                 cp send cp thebadguest stop

If all you want to do is "hit the red button" for a period,
then issue a CP STOP command.  Then CP BEGIN when you want to resume.
You could also issue a CP SLEEP with or without a time.  (Usually used
with a time spec.  Without a time spec, CP BEGIN or console interrupt
to wake up and resume execution.)

>From the console of that guest, with default TERM LINEND, try

                 #cp sleep
                  -or-
                 #cp stop

-- R;   <><


<<image/gif>>

Reply via email to