Re: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

2006-05-30 Thread Loren Charnley, Jr.
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization We are looking at upgrading from z/VM 4.3 to supported z/VM 5.1. Because z/VM 5.1 will not run on our 9672-x27, we will have to upgrade boxes first. We need to choose a new box based on what capacity we will be needing. We are aware

Re: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

2006-05-30 Thread Bill Bitner
Tim, the biggest change from a CPU perspective would be the removal of V=R and V=F support. See http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/z890.html for some background. z/VM 5.2 did have significant changes in the area of memory management. However, since you were on a 31-bit addressing machine (9672) the

z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

2006-05-29 Thread Tim Joyce
We are looking at upgrading from z/VM 4.3 to supported z/VM 5.1. Because z/VM 5.1 will not run on our 9672-x27, we will have to upgrade boxes first. We need to choose a new box based on what capacity we will be needing. We are aware of several changestoz/VM between versions (i.e. 64 bit

Re: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

2006-05-29 Thread Richard Schuh
Tim Joyce wrote: We are looking at upgrading from z/VM 4.3 to supported z/VM 5.1. Because z/VM 5.1 will not run on our 9672-x27, we will have to upgrade boxes first. We need to choose a new box based on what capacity we will be needing. We are aware of several changes to z/VM between

Re: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

2006-05-29 Thread Rich Smrcina
I absolutely concur that you should be looking at z/VM 5.2. The detail of release to release performance changes are at: http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/changes/ With measurements in the performance report, which is a link at the bottom of the page. On Monday 29 May 2006 12:39 pm, Tim Joyce wrote: