> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of
> mike.wawio...@barclays.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:20 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
>
> It will very l
> Thanks, all for the answers - that is what I suspected. We have z/VM
> and
> z/VSE guests running in the only LPAR; if there was a move to initiate
> running LINUX in the same z/VM, perhaps as a proof of concept, I
> wouldn't think the costs would increase.
Correct.
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
> Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux, why
> it's not cost effective. For example, if we already have z/VM running,
> there is no additional cost involved.
If you already pay for VM on your st
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Grady
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:10 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: z/VM Linux on Cp
>
>
> OK - this one will get a lau
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
I have only one production z/LINUX and a test z/LINUX that runs just
fine with no IFL. Most
rating System on behalf of Wakser, David
Sent: Wed 10/7/2009 9:18 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
Adam:
Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux, why
it's not cost effective. For example, if we already have z/VM running,
there is no addi
> Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux, why
> it's not cost effective. For example, if we already have z/VM running,
> there is no additional cost involved.
If you already pay for VM on your standard engines, the issue is less serious.
But:
1) Standard engines are 4x
more attrictave. ... a
10 at 8 but a 1 at 2
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Wakser, David
Sent: Wed 10/7/2009 9:18 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
Adam:
Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Wakser, David wrote:
Adam:
Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux, why
it's not cost effective. For example, if we already have z/VM running,
there is no additional cost involved.
David Wakser
Maybe I'm undercaffeinated. Since it's in i
stem [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Charles Grady wrote:
OK - this one will get a laugh if sure but --
Will Linux run in an LPAR with o
m
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: 07 October 2009 15:18
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
Adam:
Please explain,
k.edu] On
Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Linux on Cp
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Charles Grady wrote:
>
> OK - this one will get a laugh if sure but --
>
> Will Linux run in an LPAR with only a CP and NO
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Charles Grady wrote:
OK - this one will get a laugh if sure but --
Will Linux run in an LPAR with only a CP and NO IFL ?
I know that one most likely would not run a like this for long,
but being ask to install Linux PDQ in an LPAR that does NOT have a
IFL assign
OK - this one will get a laugh if sure but --
Will Linux run in an LPAR with only a CP and NO IFL ?
I know that one most likely would not run a like this for long,
but being ask to install Linux PDQ in an LPAR that does NOT have a IFL assigned.
Thanks for the reply.
**
14 matches
Mail list logo
