Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread David Kreuter
our cooperation."/ *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Steve Gentry *Sent:* Thursday, June 01, 2006 14:34 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: [IBMVM] z9 and zVM 5.2 Fast? We like fast. *David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Marcy Cortes
, June 01, 2006 13:51To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Re: [IBMVM] z9 and zVM 5.2 Maybe a ZAP processor ... ?   JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel:  +1 703 708 3479 Fax:  +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Imler, Steven J
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Re: z9 and zVM 5.2 oh yeah, it's fast :)   one of the production machines is a z9 and the other a z990.  my perf guys here say something's up with that z9 and it's more than just the MIPS.  things perform much better (our java WAS stuff that is).       Marcy Corte

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Marcy Cortes
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation."   From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve GentrySent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 14:34To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Re: [IBMVM] z9 and zVM 5.2 Fa

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Steve Gentry
Fast?    We like fast. David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 06/01/2006 02:55 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System                 To:        IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU         cc:                 Subject:        Re: z9 and  zVM 5.2

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread David Boyes
The z9 has no basic mode, so you can’t run the thing totally native (you have to define at least one LPAR), but if you’re asking if you can run one big LPAR, put VM in it, and parcel it out via CP, then sure, works great. Regular admonitions apply (get current RSU and buckets, refit mods if

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Steve Gentry
    To:        IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU         cc:                 Subject:        Re: z9 and  zVM 5.2 On second thought, the new MPROUTE of TCPIP 520 needs the latest TCPIP PTFs and some related supporting PTFs to CMS and Language Environment.   This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, pr

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Romanowski, John (OFT)
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gentry Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:24 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: z9 and zVM 5.2   Hello.  Is anyone here running zVM 5.2 on a z9,  first level/native? Any issues pro or con? Thanks Steve G.

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Marcy Cortes
Steve GentrySent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 13:24To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: [IBMVM] z9 and zVM 5.2 Hello.  Is anyone here running zVM 5.2 on a z9,  first level/native? Any issues pro or con? Thanks Steve G.

Re: z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Romanowski, John (OFT)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gentry Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:24 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: z9 and zVM 5.2   Hello.  Is anyone here running zVM 5.2 on a z9,  first level/native? Any issues pro or con? Thanks Steve G.

z9 and zVM 5.2

2006-06-01 Thread Steve Gentry
Hello.  Is anyone here running zVM 5.2 on a z9,  first level/native? Any issues pro or con? Thanks Steve G.