All of this and a great deal more is discussed in various old books,
such as:
- Internetwork Mobility - The CDPD Approach
Taylor, Waung and Banan
Prentice Hall
1996
ISBN: 0-13-209693-5
Hope this helps.
...Mohsen
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:04:39 -0400, Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I would rather have one address for a wireless WAN interface and
> >another address for a wireless LAN interface -- which seems to be
> >doable today -- much more than I want to wait for the solution
> >with "Mobile IP" address traversal to become commercially available.
>
> No, what you want
James;
> The prevailing view seems to be that wide-area wireless
> devices need to be "mobile" in the sense that they are
> able to move from one network to another. This is not
> the case, and maybe not even desirable. I believe that
> this view has led to easily avoidable delays in wirele
At 10:47 -0700 10/18/00, James P. Salsman wrote:
>Klass,
>
>Thanks for your reply:
>
> >> Is there any compelling reason why wireless IP needs to
> >> be "mobile" in the sense of traversing networks?
> >
> > yes, I don't want to pay my expensive cellular operator when near a
> > wireless LAN
In Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
James said:
> Is there any compelling reason why wireless IP needs to
> be "mobile" in the sense of traversing networks?
My opinion is yes, just so others can reach you/your server.
^^^
If you are running services o
Klass,
Thanks for your reply:
>> Is there any compelling reason why wireless IP needs to
>> be "mobile" in the sense of traversing networks?
>
> yes, I don't want to pay my expensive cellular operator when near a
> wireless LAN access point.
That's a good reason, but it doesn't require such a
The following are the pages for the IPng working group.
http://playground.sun.com/ipng
Bob
At 10:23 AM 10/18/2000 +0800, luoyan wrote:
>Hello,
> may I have your attention please?
> I want to know the information about IPV6,can you help me ?
Sam Liang wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering if there has been any work done on enhancing TCP to allow
> unreliable transmission for real-time applications (audio/video). Any
> information is appreciated.
>
> Sam
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam:
I will put forth two answers to your question...
At 00:42 18/10/2000 -0700, James P. Salsman wrote:
>The prevailing view seems to be that wide-area wireless
>devices need to be "mobile" in the sense that they are
>able to move from one network to another. This is not
>the case, and maybe not even desirable. I believe that
>this view has led to
Trying to fix my ideas with networks I searched but couldn't find (at least
at my book shop) a definition for data networks. I finally came up with my
own:
"A data network is an entity that occasionnally allow (enought) unanbiguous
information transfert between any 2 access point in a set of 3 or
James,
> Is there any compelling reason why wireless IP needs to
> be "mobile" in the sense of traversing networks?
yes, I don't want to pay my expensive cellular operator when near a
wireless LAN access point.
Klaas
The prevailing view seems to be that wide-area wireless
devices need to be "mobile" in the sense that they are
able to move from one network to another. This is not
the case, and maybe not even desirable. I believe that
this view has led to easily avoidable delays in wireless
internet servi
12 matches
Mail list logo
