This needs to be given some attention in the IETF...\Stef
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:25:45 + (GMT Standard Time)
From: Frode Greisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave
Using Pine as my mailer I found Microsoft XP outlook users could not read
my attachments. We found
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:37:02 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] (by way of Einar Stefferud)
Subject: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This needs to be given some attention in the IETF...\Stef
Date:
At the minimum, such violations of IETF Standards should be formally
noted in a letter from the IAB to the offending vendor, whoever that
might be, when such information becomes available to the IESG or the
IAB.
Among other things, such notices would result in a formally recorded
track
Seemingly of interest specifically to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:57 PM 1/21/2002 -0800, Lixia Zhang wrote:
Note I am not saying MPLS is the right solution for the problem.
To me the right solution to the above mentioned problem should be a
multi-path
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I think the reason Einar forwarded it was for this:
The problem is that due to the Market share of Microsoft an error in a
Microsoft program may force non-Microsoft users to make changes, and
possibly also imply a loss of mail functionality.
There *is* the
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:30:48 PST, Einar Stefferud said:
At the minimum, such violations of IETF Standards should be formally
noted in a letter from the IAB to the offending vendor, whoever that
might be, when such information becomes available to the IESG or the
IAB.
PS:I
