John,
JAL> Aren't we being a bit holery-than-though? Are we suggesting that we are
JAL> superior than tourists, marketers, mangagers?
of course.
but separate from the possibility of ethnocentric arrogance is the
reality of distraction. to the extent that such participation makes it
difficult fo
"John A. Loughney" wrote:
[..]
> Aren't we being a bit holery-than-though? Are we suggesting that we are
> superior than tourists, marketers, mangagers?
If one isn't any better than tourists, marketers or mangagers then
I'd suggest one re-thinks why one is attending _working_ group meeti
Is that called INET meetings?
Franck Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hoffman / IMC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 24 March 2003 12:11
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Barrel-bottom scraping
>
>
> At 12:05 AM +0200 3/24/03, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >I fail to see
At 12:05 AM +0200 3/24/03, Pekka Savola wrote:
I fail to see what added value they might bring
They could be very useful to explaining to our management and
marketing departments and so on the value of standards, particularly
IETF standards. Further, because most companies focus on a small part
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 02:58:47PM -0800, Randy Presuhn allegedly wrote:
> Black and white is the sensible choice. I recall one
> presentation that used red to identify important points.
> It will probably lose much of its impact in the hardcopy
> proceedings. :-)
I don't know anyone who has asked
Hi -
> From: "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Perry E. Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:40 AM
> Subject: Re: slide fonts
...
> The usual rule is never go below 18pt. 24-28pt is the better choice.
>
> Equally important is contrast.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=index_08[1].jpg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID:
/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgAAZABkAAD/7AARRHVja3kAAQAELQAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGTA
Af/bAIQACgcHBwgHCggICg4JCAkOEQ0KCg0RFBAQERAQFBMPERAQEQ8TExcXGRcXEx4eICAe
HiwrKyssMTExMTExMTExMQELCQkLDAsNCwsN
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, John A. Loughney wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 06:58:32AM +0200, Pekka Savola allegedly wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > > [...] However, I think doing some ISOC/IETF joint
> > > > tutorials just before an IETF is definitely worth a try.
> > >
> Since they would be taught by IETF engineers, probably for
> not all that much money, it seems a bit onerous to ask the
> benefactors to do more travel so that they carry out a difficult
> task mostly for the benefit of the IETF.
> ...
charlie, you're talking to someone who has spent a considera
Hello Randy,
Since they would be taught by IETF engineers, probably for
not all that much money, it seems a bit onerous to ask the
benefactors to do more travel so that they carry out a difficult
task mostly for the benefit of the IETF.
Someone else pointed out that tutorials don't automatically
m
> I think that ISOC/IETF tutorials could be a very good idea. It would at
> least give us the opportunity to brain-wash others for the things which
> we believe.
yup. but, as one would want them done by the well clued and best
speakers, it would be nice if they were not too close to ietf
meeting
Hi all,
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 06:58:32AM +0200, Pekka Savola allegedly wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > [...] However, I think doing some ISOC/IETF joint
> > > tutorials just before an IETF is definitely worth a try.
> >
> > That would unarguably incur a clear increa
Could you delete my Email from this mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you.
Best regards.
13 matches
Mail list logo
