On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Tony Hain wrote:
Dean Anderson wrote:
...
Allowing a non-global address space as a subset of the global space means
that one (or many) can reach the public network through a default route
that leads to a NAT. But if you have such a large network that it has
Hi,
Is the IETF or ISOC going to take any stance against this slippery slope?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/03/20/new.domains.ap/
Comment period closes April 30th.
Tim
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Wednesday, 21 April, 2004 15:46 +0100 Tim Chown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is the IETF or ISOC going to take any stance against this
slippery slope?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/03/20/new.domains.ap/
Comment period closes April 30th.
Tim,
Addressing the IETF part of your
I suspect I am going to regret asking, but how is this a slippery slope,
and why should anyone be against it? Perhaps more to the point, why
should the IETF have any interest whatsoever?
--Dean
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Tim Chown wrote:
Hi,
Is the IETF or ISOC going to take any
Tony,
Tony Hain wrote:
As far as redefining 224/4; it is likely going to be impossible to redefine
this space as no one really knows what it is being used for.
Did you mean to say 224/4, or 240/4 - or perhaps both?
Thanks - Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
An interim meeting of the MARID WG will be held in Campbell, California on May 19-20,
2004. The meeting will start at noon on Wednesday the 19th and continue until early
evening on Thursday the 20th.
This meeting corresponds to the second milestone of MARID's
charter
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Payment API for v1.0 Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP) '
draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-papi-06.txt as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Internet Open Trading Protocol Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Scott
