On 2007-03-14 04:29, David Kessens wrote:
John,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:04:52AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
If the IESG is going to claim a silent majority in favor of
approving this document, so be it. But to claim that there were
no Last Call comments and that those that were solicited
On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Robert,
--On March 13, 2007 3:23:22 PM -0400 Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This text is actively misleading, because it suggests RFC 4346 is
included for informational purposes. The text should read:
At a minimum, client and server
Brian E Carpenter schrieb:
On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
The text that got used in CalDAV (which is about to be published) is:
o MUST support transport over TLS [RFC2246] as defined in [RFC2818]
(note that [RFC2246] has been obsoleted by [RFC4346]);
with 2246, 2818 and 4346
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Just to confirm: 2818 has already been downrefed so it can be used in
this way without further formality.
http://www1.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry
There appear to have been two kinds of Last Calls:
1) Last Call for document
This is an automatic reply. I am on vacation or otherwise unable to read my
email. I will read your message when I return.
Thank you,
Nico
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian E Carpenter schrieb:
On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
The text that got used in CalDAV (which is about to be published) is:
o MUST support transport over TLS [RFC2246] as defined in [RFC2818]
(note that [RFC2246] has been
On 2007-03-14 15:17, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Just to confirm: 2818 has already been downrefed so it can be used in
this way without further formality.
http://www1.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry
There appear to have been two kinds
Basavaraj Patil wrote:
Hello,
A slightly revised version of the I-D is now available at:
http://people.nokia.net/~patil/IDs/draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-over-ipv6cs-09.txt
This revision incorporates changes based on some of the comments made by the
directorate. It will be submitted to the ID
I'm not sure how helpful this is, but the email sent by the Hilton has
the following boilerplate attached:
CZECHOUSE GRILL ROTISSERIE
The only fine-dining non-smoking restaurant in Prague!
Open for lunch on weekdays from noon till 3 PM
Open for dinner daily from 6 PM till 11 PM
For
Can you show me real examples of an RIR repossessing address
space? If
so, what is stopping them from reclaiming some of those /8s?
ARIN regularly repossesses address space according to their treasurer.
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-March/006129.html
This fact is well known to
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It is reported by The Economist dated March 10 that if you buy duty free
liquids outside Europe, carry them on the plane with you, and have to go
through airport security while changing planes in Europe, your liquids
will be confiscated, assuming they exceed 100 ccs.
Guys - This is true (or, supposed to be true) in ALL countries. You go
between two sterile environments, and ALL the rules get reset. This isn't a
Europe thing, a U.S. thing, or a foobar thing. It's the way airport
security works.
On 3/14/07 2:55 PM, Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Burger wrote:
Guys - This is true (or, supposed to be true) in ALL countries. You go
between two sterile environments, and ALL the rules get reset. This isn't a
Europe thing, a U.S. thing, or a foobar thing. It's the way airport
security works.
Sure. But while folk like us probably
Eric Burger wrote:
Guys - This is true (or, supposed to be true) in ALL countries. You go
between two sterile environments, and ALL the rules get reset. This isn't a
Europe thing, a U.S. thing, or a foobar thing. It's the way airport
security works.
Sure. But while folk like
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:31:40PM -0800, David Morris wrote:
So I got curious and checked the 'current' list. Looks to me like the
question revolving around MIT is small potatoes compared with some
other organizations ... HP now owns two /8 blocks ... their own and DECs.
HP is down
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'On the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure Channels '
draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The introduction of this draft implies that the facility being
discussed
The IESG has received a request from the Kerberos WG (krb-wg) to
consider the following document:
- 'Extended Kerberos Version 5 Key Distribution Center (KDC) Exchanges
Over TCP '
draft-ietf-krb-wg-tcp-expansion-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next
17 matches
Mail list logo
