Theodore Tso ty...@mit.edu writes:
However, that presumably wouldn't be tree for allowing text or code to
be used in implementations, open source or otherwise --- I assume
that wouldn't require prior permission first, right?
Right, but only for code. See section 4 of
Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com writes:
Simon:
For the people who want this draft published (and perhaps have a pending
implementation), would you please humour me by offering some usage
scenarios, other than debugging or toys, which would meet security
review and which are not covered by
- Original Message -
From: Theodore Tso ty...@mit.edu
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:23 AM
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:50:46AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Consider the threat model here.
This threat applies ONLY to material that the Trust licenses to
third parties (such as,
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:54 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Theodore Tso ty...@mit.edu
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:23 AM
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:50:46AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Consider the threat model here.
This threat applies ONLY to material that
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:04:13AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
This raises a question. The IETF publishes relatively little code
compared to the millions of lines of open source code out there. How
do the large open source projects protect and indemnify themselves
and their participants in
Simon:
For the people who want this draft published (and perhaps have a pending
implementation), would you please humour me by offering some usage
scenarios, other than debugging or toys, which would meet security
review and which are not covered by the four points which the
patent-holder
At 16:23 15-01-2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
That I think is the key; each person can only warrant what they
themselves have authored. Something that might be worth looking at is
the Developer's Certification of Origin, which is how Linux Kernel
developers deal with contributions for the Linux
SM s...@resistor.net writes:
which gets incoproated into the kernel must have a Signed-off-by, like
this:
The IETF does not use version control to keep track of changes to a
document.
Version control is not needed to track changes.
Document changes cannot be compared to code contributions
As promised, I have put together some web pages about Hiroshima.
Intended to augment rather than replace any official IETF or local
host pages, my pages cover how to get there as well as other bits
of (hopefully) useful information. I am sure the local host will
provide more detailed city
I have a few textual nits which I will forward to the authors, however I
have an areas of concern in from an implementation perspective.
section-3 page 10 paragraph states
If a given component type within a prefix in unknown, the prefix in
question cannot be used for traffic filtering
Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com writes:
EXAMPLE
Clearance may be the easiest one. For simplicity, let's assume that
the client are server already have X.509 identity certificates.
Assume the server is operated by the military, and it includes some
information that its wants to share with
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Simplified Extension of LSP Space for IS-IS '
draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-05.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ross Callon and David Ward.
A URL of
12 matches
Mail list logo
