em nonetheless.
> > > > >
> > > > >Melinda
> > > > >___
> > > > >Ietf mailing list
> > > > >Ietf@ietf.org
> > > > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
A bit agreement with John and Scott. Let's close this up and move on.
Cheers,
Andy
I agree with the following additional mods to the Trust License Policy
at http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy.pdf
6. Text To Be Inclu
A bit agreement with John and Scott. Let's close this up and move on.
Cheers,
Andy
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> John, I believe you read the consensus right. "authors obtain all of
> the rights they are willing to".
>
> Excerpts from John C Klensin on Tue, Mar 24, 2009 0
On Mar 23, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
It's happened to me twice, with two different lists of his. I've
complained to him, but to no avail. I wonder if the CAN SPAM act
applies.
IANAL but my impression is that it definitely does apply, possibly
mu
Hi all,
The TICTOC WG is finalizing the scope of its requirements draft.
As of now the draft has information regarding the timing requirements for
-Cellular Backhauling
-Circuit Emulation
-Test and Measurement
-ToD over the general Internet
we have still unintegrat
At 16:35 24-03-2009, John C Klensin wrote:
I just attended the IPR ("Pre-5398 Problem") BOF and want to
share an impression and suggestion.
While one could debate details of text and procedures endlessly,
reopen old battles, etc., there is really only one issue at
this point, and that issue is
I suggest that all mail that is cross posted to Mr Andreson IETF-Honest or
whatever other spam list Mr Spammer decides to create be blocked from all IETF
lists.
That way any IETF-er who feeds the troll will not anoy the rest. And any
IETF-er who blacklists Mr Spammer and his spam lists will ha
John, I believe you read the consensus right. "authors obtain all of
the rights they are willing to".
Excerpts from John C Klensin on Tue, Mar 24, 2009 07:35:55PM -0400:
> Hi.
>
> I just attended the IPR ("Pre-5398 Problem") BOF and want to
> share an impression and suggestion.
>
> While one co
Hi.
I just attended the IPR ("Pre-5398 Problem") BOF and want to
share an impression and suggestion.
While one could debate details of text and procedures endlessly,
reopen old battles, etc., there is really only one issue at
this point, and that issue is whether the community wants to
Dean,
I feel that this issue has gone on Long enough It seems to me that by not
allowing people to opt out and by unsolicited subscriptions you are only
damaging your own reputation. I read what is posted to the lists I subscribe to
so that I can do my job better. Not to waste time with these si
Dean,
The web interface is broken. I don't have the initial password and it
won't send me a new one.
Please cease and desist this nonsense and unsubscribe me promptly, I
never asked to be on your list, nor did anyone else that you added.
You're a spammer, plain and simple.
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
The newly minted RFC 5429 offers a solution:
if envelope :domain :contains "from" ["av8.net", "av8.com",
"iadl.org"] {
ereject "go away"; stop;
}
-- Kurt
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
I was subscribed and was able to unsubcribe w/o any difficulties so as to
make the experience memorable. I would much prefer to not have been
bothered.
I recall very fondly the list filtered relay Fred mentions ...
unfortunately, one day it just stopped functioning w/o warning.
Dave Morris
I think he added the ietf list as a whole. When I tried to
unsubscribe it said I needed a password which it never sent,
so I assume I am not "on" his list the strict sense.
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415
Hello,
I have some concerns about draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp-09; there are
several issues that deserve to be addressed. This message is a
response to the last call.
There is no definition of how CCM and GCM are to be used to protect
RTCP. It would not be possible to use this specification
well, question. Did he actually do that, or did he make a mailing list
that has one member - the IETF list - to which he can add other
members as he chooses?
You may recall that at some point in the past we had the opposite.
Someone set up a mailing list that was subscribed to ietf@ietf.org
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:25:50AM -0400, Melinda Shore wrote:
> Todd, if you can't figure out the differences between
> an IP address and an email address, delivering packets and
> delivering email, well, I don't know.
>
> And Dean's *not* "the IETF." The IETF has some people
> acting in designat
Simon, Thank you for your message.
> ... is there any particular reason why IETF Trust documents aren't written
> using the excellent xml2rfc tool?
Actually ... no.
This is a good suggestion.
Best Regards,
Ed
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Ed Juskevicius writes:
Todd Glassey CISM CIFI wrote:
Sorry Melinda - boy are your wrong - and you need to know that you may
need to get legal advice on this - because you nor anyone else here owns
their own IP addresses anymore... you gave them away to the IETF when
you submitted them to the IETF under the NoteWell p
Melinda Shore wrote:
I was auto-subscribed to Dean's "ietf-honest" mailing
list, and I'm unhappy about it.
Sorry Melinda - boy are your wrong - and you need to know that you may
need to get legal advice on this - because you nor anyone else here owns
their own IP addresses anymore... you gave t
$100 so far
And Dean is in my state so small claims is just down the road.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-honest-boun...@lists.iadl.org on behalf of Dean Anderson
Sent: Mon 3/23/2009 10:46 PM
To: John Levine
Cc: ietf-hon...@lists.iadl.org; ietf@ietf.org; dcroc...@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: [Ie
Ed Juskevicius writes:
> FYI, a well-written new FAQ has just been posted to the IETF Trust website.
Thank you!
This may sound as nit-picking, but is there any particular reason why
IETF Trust documents aren't written using the excellent xml2rfc tool? I
find the output from xml2rfc is more rea
22 matches
Mail list logo
