Bob Braden wrote:
Jim,
Understood, but the RFC Editor does care how it flows. We would like to
get it as nearly right as possible, going out of the gate.
Bob Braden
...
For tracking purposes, I just published draft-reschke-hab-00
I'm quite happy for the subject matter experts to decide between
these two approaches.
Thanks
Brian
On 2009-11-27 01:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
These are the sort of changes that would, I believe, give
Samuel Weiler wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
And for the common-use:
Registration of an IMAP keyword intended for common use (whether or
not they use the $ prefix) requires Expert Review [RFC5226]. IESG
appoints one or more Expert Reviewer, one of which is
--On Saturday, November 28, 2009 9:29 PM + Alexey Melnikov
alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote:
...
I'm hearing it's within the scope of the expert's judgement
to require an IETF Consensus doc and In cases when an IMAP
Keyword being registered is already deployed, Expert
Reviewers should
On 2009-11-24 06:44, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:16:49 -0500
Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon Josefsson allegedly wrote on 11/23/2009 5:03 AM:
John-Luc said he is bound by confidentiality obligations from his
company, and I think the same applies to most
