On 13 jul 2010, at 7:19, Hasnaa Moustafa wrote:
I understood that the train runs daily from Brussels to Maastricht.
There are more than 10 connections daily. I can't seem to find the direct
Brussels - Maastricht train right now, though, the best options I see are with
two changes.
When in
On 13 jul 2010, at 7:19, Hasnaa Moustafa wrote:
I understood that the train runs daily from Brussels to Maastricht.
There are more than 10 connections daily. I can't seem to find
the direct Brussels - Maastricht train right now, though, the
best options I see are with
Right, but Dutch trains are not nearly as nice as German
ICE trains.
Ole
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Note though that there are options with more changes that are more
than an hour faster, Eindhoven is about 100 km beyond Maastricht
seen from Frankfurt.
There this:
http://www.maastrichtbrusselexpress.nl/?id=26
But apparently it doesn't run on Sunday.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Iljitsch van Beijnum
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:03 AM
To: IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Re:
On 13 jul 2010, at 9:22, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Right, but Dutch trains are not nearly as nice as German
ICE trains.
There are many different kinds of trains in the Netherlands. Indeed only some
of them equal ICEs. However, by traveling through Eindhoven you're almost
certainly subjecting
On 07/13/2010 09:23 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
When in doubt, consult www.bahn.de
Since Brussles is i Belgie the last timeI looked, you might be better of
looking athttp://www.b-rail.be/main/E/
That's the same software. If b-rail.be is competent about updating its
route database with
- Original Message -
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: IETF 78: getting to/from/around Maastricht
On 07/13/2010 09:23 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
When in doubt, consult www.bahn.de
Since Brussles
That's the same software. If b-rail.be is competent about
updating its route database with other companies' trains, then
the results will be exactly as good as for bahn.de.
In that case, give ns.nl (dutch railways) a try. They seem to list
during the day a direct train between
(Not sure why this ended up on the main list instead of just the
ietf-78-attendees, but):
Right. My initial search (long time ago), gave Frankfurt Airport to
Maastricht via Strassbourg as the best option (combination of least
time and least changes), this later changed to Eindhoven, and yes,
On 07/13/2010 11:38 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
I'm not really planning to take a train to IETF-79 but it is an
interesting idea. The Dutch internatial railway site
http://www.nshispeed.nl/nl/internationale-trein planner does show
you the Oslo- Peking trip which seems to take 196 hrs 2 min
On 13 jul 2010, at 11:38, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
That's the same software. If b-rail.be is competent about
updating its route database with other companies' trains, then
the results will be exactly as good as for bahn.de.
In that case, give ns.nl (dutch railways) a try. They seem to
Ben,
Thank you for your review comments from the GEN-ART perspective.
I think I have dealt with all your points in my responses, which are inline...
There is just one outstanding question for you concerning updating BCP4774...
At 22:23 01/07/2010, Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned
Hi,
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document:
No, if you read my book you would see the scheme I am proposing.
The problem with current MAC addresses is that they are not
trustworthy. That is accepted. If MAC addresses were not trivially
forged then the existing WiFi scheme would work fine.
What I am saying is that if people got really
Well maybe if you read the full thread rather than just cherry picking
parts of it you would have understood the point better.
My original argument was that I think the IETF should eat the WiFi
authentication dog-food here because the current product tastes like
poo and the only way things are
Intel got a bloody nose on that one because they were incompetent and lied.
A few weeks before the launch an Intel person told me about the serial
number scheme as a means of tracking down CPUs stolen during
distribution. Then at the launch we were told how the serial number
was going to enable a
Russ,
NIST has quite a few people contributed to the effort from IETF spec to
deployment. I am going to ask Doug Montgomery to give you the list.
David
Dr. David H. Su
Chief, Advanced Network Technologies Division
Information Technology Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology
-Original Message-
From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Chair
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:36 PM
To: IETF; IETF Announce
Subject: DNSSEC Contributors
We are collecting names of individuals from the IETF community who have
On 13 jul 2010, at 18:49, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
fun technologies like AJAX but also opens up the possibility for
new attacks (cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery,
malvertising, clickjacking, and all the rest).
Isn't this W3C stuff?
There are more than 10 connections daily. I can't seem to find
the direct Brussels - Maastricht train right now, though, the
best options I see are with two changes.
The SNCB web site is reasonably competent:
http://www.b-europe.com/Voyager/Acheter/Billets
On Sunday there don't seem
On 7/13/10 3:33 PM, John Levine wrote:
There are more than 10 connections daily. I can't seem to find
the direct Brussels - Maastricht train right now, though, the
best options I see are with two changes.
The SNCB web site is reasonably competent:
On 7/13/10 3:26 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 13 jul 2010, at 18:49, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
fun technologies like AJAX but also opens up the possibility for
new attacks (cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery,
malvertising, clickjacking, and all the rest).
Isn't this W3C
On 7/13/10 3:26 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 13 jul 2010, at 18:49, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
fun technologies like AJAX but also opens up the possibility for
new attacks (cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery,
malvertising, clickjacking, and all the rest).
Isn't this W3C
Jaap == Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl writes:
Jaap I'm not really planning to take a train to IETF-79 but it is
Jaap an interesting idea. The Dutch internatial railway site
Jaap http://www.nshispeed.nl/nl/internationale-trein planner does
Jaap show you the Oslo - Peking trip
13.07.2010 13:38, Jaap Akkerhuis пишет:
That's the same software. If b-rail.be is competent about
updating its route database with other companies' trains, then
the results will be exactly as good as for bahn.de.
In that case, give ns.nl (dutch railways) a try. They seem to list
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Comcast's Protocol-Agnostic Congestion Management System '
draft-livingood-woundy-congestion-mgmt-05.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
A new IETF working group has been formed in the Real-time Applications and
Infrastructure Area. For additional information, please contact the Area
Directors or the WG Chairs.
Sip ALerting for User Devices (salud)
--
Chair(s):
Dale Worley
78th IETF Meeting
Maastricht, Netherlands
July 25-30, 2010
1. Registration: Early Bird Cut-off is this Friday 16 July
2. Social Event
Please note: Breakfast will -NOT- be provided at the MECC (IETF meeting
venue)
===
1) Registration Cut-off
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements '
draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the DNS Extensions Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ralph Droms and Jari
29 matches
Mail list logo
