Since someone asked about this, I wanted to clarify why and how new
versions of this draft are being posted while the last call is going on.
The document has been revised once in order to address two very minor
details left over from the first round of my AD review (IMO not blocking
issues), an
On 8/13/2010 10:40 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Based on a sample of 3 (Hiroshima, Anaheim and Maastricht) I am not at
all sure your statement is factually correct. Tokyo would have been
better than Hiroshima and Amsterdam might have been better than
Maastricht and maybe "LA" (a big place) would hav
--On Thursday, August 12, 2010 16:41 -0500 Barry Leiba
wrote:
>> I think Vancouver would be an excellent city for a recurring
>> North American meeting. There is a reasonable convenience
>> factor in terms of nearby hotels, restuarants and food
>> markets (there's an excellent one just a coupl
It's is certainly possible to make it to Hiroshima on a day trip from Tokyo. N1
leaves Tokyo at 0600 and arrives in Hiroshima at 0943 so you opinion is rather
poorly informed.
In a business context people do it all the time.
Joel's iPad
On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:48, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>
>
All;
At the request of the community the IAOC and the IETF Trust have approved
the establishment of an online store from which the community can buy IETF
logo wear.
The store is at CafePress at: http://www.cafepress.com/ietf
The store is maintained by the Internet Society and is expected to
gen
>> I think Vancouver would be an excellent city for a recurring
>> North American meeting. There is a reasonable convenience
>> factor in terms of nearby hotels, restuarants and food
>> markets (there's an excellent one just a couple blocks from
>> the venue). However, based on the poll, it seem
By "people" I meant anyone who attends an IETF meeting.
Your email does remind us that the set of people who responded to the survey
does not
necessarily match the set of people who attend IETFs (in the sense that some
people,
perhaps frequent IETF attendees, might be more likely to respond t
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
> Well, since the target market isn't really specified and the
> criteria for satisfying it aren't specified, what's really going on
> is a lot of private models that probably don't match.
The target market was well specified in Hiroshima: Expose a new
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> Ole, the obvious question here can be stated more or less as
> follows:
>
> (1) The sponsor wants to expose a community in which they are
> interested to our work.
This was the case in Japan, yes. But I will remind you that we
already have a "newcom
Subject: IETF Logo Wear Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:26:53AM -0700 Quoting
IETF Administrative Director (i...@ietf.org):
> Shouldn't everyone in your family have an IETF logo wear t-shirt?
Indeed they should. Where are the child sizes?
/Father of three Internet users
--
Måns Nilsson pri
We obviously need an IETF branded one of these:
http://www.cafepress.com/+theres_127001_infant_bodysuit,88172
---> Phil
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, IETF Administrative Director
wrote:
> All;
>
> At the request of the community the IAOC and the IETF Trust have approved
> the establish
On 8/16/2010 8:29 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
I am not sure whether it is safe to extrapolate this to the conclusion that
people don't want to rotate between just a few cities on a long term basis.
By "people", you presumably mean the well-funded, frequent travelers who like to
be entertained, as
--On Monday, August 16, 2010 11:05 -0700 Ole Jacobsen
wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>>
>> Well, since the target market isn't really specified and the
>> criteria for satisfying it aren't specified, what's really
>> going on is a lot of private models that probably don't
Disclaimer:
I'm generally in favor of the Day Pass model, and I happen to think that
attendance by tourists is fine. I think we must not make strategic decisions
that affect our primary work, in order to accommodate tourists, but I think it
well and good to make ourselves open to them.
Or http://www.cafepress.com/+tcpip_infant_bodysuit,287721854
Alia
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Philip Nesser wrote:
> We obviously need an IETF branded one of these:
> http://www.cafepress.com/+theres_127001_infant_bodysuit,88172
>
>
> ---> Phil
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, IE
There's no place like ::1
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Philip Nesser wrote:
> We obviously need an IETF branded one of these:
> http://www.cafepress.com/+theres_127001_infant_bodysuit,88172
>
>
> ---> Phil
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, IETF Administrative Director
>
or http://www.pdphoto.org/PictureDetail.php?mat=&pg=7634
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> There's no place like ::1
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Philip Nesser wrote:
>
>> We obviously need an IETF branded one of these:
>> http://www.cafepress.com/+theres_127001_in
I like:
"Be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you accept"
Jon Postel
I'm sure somebody who has been around longer than me can offer up a
date ;)
spt
Fred Baker wrote:
There's no place like ::1
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Philip Nesser wrote:
We obviously ne
IEN 111, August 1979. The preface reads:
This document describes the Internet Protocol. There have been three
previous editions of this specification, and the present text draws
heavily from them. There have been many contributors to this document
both in terms of concepts and in terms of text.
That's going to be hard to fit on a t-shirt, Fred.
*ducks*
On 17/08/2010, at 8:34 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> IEN 111, August 1979. The preface reads:
>
> This document describes the Internet Protocol. There have been three
> previous editions of this specification, and the present text draws
> h
Classic:
IP over everything
(dog optional)
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Nottingham
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 8:05 PM
To: Fred Baker
Cc: wgcha...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Logo Wear
That's going to be
An updated version based on the 6LoWPAN and other fronts work could be:
"IP on Anything"
Cheers
Jorge
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Christian Huitema
wrote:
> Classic:
>
> IP over everything
>
> (dog optional)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...
22 matches
Mail list logo
