Great thoughts from many people.
I just want to clarify a few things as I see that my message is slightly
misunderstood.
Firstly:
The core of my opinion is NOT that I think people should convert to nroff
encoding or XML coding or XHTML encoding or whatever encoding as editing
language.
I don't th
[Copying the RFC Editor to let them also check their records]
Note that the IANA registry is consistent with
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mathieu Goessens
> Sent: 25 March
On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote:
>
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by
>> tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
>>
>> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.iet
> What I'm opposed to, and what prompted my note, was purely what I
> consider a misguided effort to turn the xml2rfc model from generic
> markup into a formatting language.
For the record, I entirely agree. The reason I've proposed adding
formatting twiddles to xml2rfc is so that the RFC Ed can
On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by
> tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
>
> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944
--On Friday, March 25, 2011 13:06 -0400 "Andrew G. Malis"
wrote:
> I know that XML is the wave of the future, but I just want to
> give Stefan a plug as a happy user that NroffEdit makes the
> mechanical and formatting part of writing drafts almost
> effortless.
And, had it appeared a decade a
Hi folks,
The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by
tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
Do you know what is
I know that XML is the wave of the future, but I just want to give
Stefan a plug as a happy user that NroffEdit makes the mechanical and
formatting part of writing drafts almost effortless.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.iet
--On Thursday, March 24, 2011 02:14 +0100 Stefan Santesson
wrote:
> I can't escape the feeling that this discussion of using
> markup language editing to produce RFCs, is a bit upside down.
>
> I'm much more concerned with draft writers having to deal with
> markup syntax than I am about draft
Greetings!
Just a quick update on the streaming stuff.
We'll be broadcasting audio streams of the meetings as of Monday. For those
interested in monitoring sessions or participating remotely the following
information may prove useful.
- -Audio Streaming-
All 8 parallel tracks at the IETF 80 m
Anybody have:
1. any rfc reference for best practice on voip deployment regarding
whether to use a static/dynamic ip?
2. any rfc material on how a voip/sip client should/must handle a dhcp
lease check/renewal when receiving a call from its server?
Thanks for your time,
Josh
_
On 25.03.2011 04:35, John Levine wrote:
...
Hijacking this thread...:
There'll be an xml2rfc related session on Sunday:
1500-1650 Tools for Creating Internet-Drafts Tutorial - Congress
Hall I
...which I'll try to attend (and maybe demo stuff, and answer questions
around the XSLT implem
12 matches
Mail list logo
