Total of 239 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Aug 5 00:53:02 EDT 2011
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
5.44% | 13 | 7.08% | 112663 | hsan...@isdg.net
6.28% | 15 | 5.61% |89298 | mo...@network-he
Hello Authors,
I think it is worth adding some texts to describe mobile CPE case, in
which CPEs with wireless modem use 3GPP access as uplink.
Gang
2011/8/2, The IESG :
>
> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'IPv6 in 3GP
How my suggestion was to be done, I left as open ended for the IETF
vets to consider if it makes sense, how its done and/or if already
provided, maybe highlight that info. Whatever. But most of all, I was
mostly suggesting a technical writing style or helpful guideline to
authors to consider. T
Does IETF in it's scope deal with the BIOS on the hardware? Sorry if
I am off-topic. Perhaps there are some bright engineers reading this
that could help.
I am prepared to offer 200 euros if any engineer alters the BIOS
fonts to a font that I prefer using opensource, ?Coreboot. I am not a
tec
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Hector Santos
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:10 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
>
> I don't know if there is a need for "temp
On 8/3/11 1:54 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 8/3/11 1:49 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>> Why can't we get informative explanations of what problem non-WG
>> mailing lists are trying to address?
>>>
>>> Purpose: This list is for discussion of IANA Registry issues to
>>> result in Happy IETF, Happy
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Koch
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:04 AM
> To: IETF Discussion
> Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
>
> I-D announcements are already copied to the relevant WG for WG
-1.
This list complies with RFC 2919, which alleviates the need for the
horrible, unscalable, obsolete, ugly kludge of Subject-line tags.
I suggest that anyone who really, *really* wants them on their copies
of messages arrange to have them added locally (perhaps by procmail or
similar) and not f
Hi,
Documents containing MIB modules must include a discussion of the
sensitivity of the tables/objects in the MIB module. This includes the
possible impact to the managed technologies that could be caused by an
unauthorized or misguided change to a configuration, for example.
Certainly the potent
I don't know if there is a need for "template" changes or some formal
section in the write up, but it would seem to me that an author who
has reached a level of getting WG assigned and/or even started a
mailing list (IETF or otherwise) would be very eager to announce it in
a new I-D (01?) submi
On 8/4/2011 7:11 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Once one knows the WG name,
And when there is no working group that the document is associated with?
In addition, there is a certain degree of exclusionary culture that comes with a
requirement that a new reader know how to derive a mailing
On 2011-08-04 16:11, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: Hector Santos
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
and/or discussion group list address, if any, for to join
and participate in the development of the I-D or sim
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill
> McQuillan [mcqui...@pobox.com]
>
> Perhaps it could be included in the ID-Announce message.
In a lot of situations, the I-D submission tool knows the name of the relevant
working group
and could include its mailing list ad
> >>> From: Hector Santos
> >>> I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
> >>> information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
> >>> and/or discussion group list address, if any, for to join
> >>> and participate in the development of the I-D or simply to
> >>> follow it
On 8/4/2011 6:47 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
This should be mandatory in IDs.
...
But there are circumstances in which the appropriate mailing
list is not known at the time of posting and others in which
permission to use an obvious mailing list requires pre-approval
that might significantly de
--On Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:36 +0200 Julian Reschke
wrote:
> On 2011-08-04 09:11, Bill McQuillan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
>>> I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include
>>> information about the existence of a Working Group, if any,
>>> and/or d
> "Marc" == Marc Petit-Huguenin writes:
Marc> I personally would like to switch to the Tufte style,
Marc> (i.e. uploading a printout, which can also be distributed to
Marc> people before the meeting in printed form, and having *only* a
Marc> discussion), but I am not sure how
Yes. No. No. Yes. Maybe. Let me elaborate.
On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> The visual cue this convention provides is helpful and it's an extremely
> widespread convention.
+1. The effect on users is completely different, even though the same
information is in there s
> "Brian" == Brian Weis writes:
Brian> Hi Sam, Thanks for your review.
Brian> Your first comment is pointing out a typo (groupkey-pull
Brian> should be groupkey-push), which I've fixed.
Brian> The anti-replay description in Section 3.3 should not say
Brian> that the push
04.08.2011 12:04, Peter Koch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
I think I have read some I-D that including this useful information,
but most do not. Its one the first things I look for.
Just a thought if it makes sense.
+100
Perhaps it could be included in
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >>I think I have read some I-D that including this useful information,
> >>but most do not. Its one the first things I look for.
> >>Just a thought if it makes sense.
> >
> >+100
> >
> >Perhaps it could be included in the ID-Announ
On 2011-08-04 09:11, Bill McQuillan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include information
about the existence of a Working Group, if any, and/or discussion
group list address, if any, for to join and participate in the
development o
On Wed, 2011-08-03, Hector Santos wrote:
> I would like to propose that new I-D submissions include information
> about the existence of a Working Group, if any, and/or discussion
> group list address, if any, for to join and participate in the
> development of the I-D or simply to follow it.
>
23 matches
Mail list logo