On 2012-05-05 04:48, Yoav Nir wrote:
...
an obvious idea would be to change the requirements for a new work item from
rough consensus to a bunch of people willing to do the work and at least
one willing to implement. Some working groups already work like this, but
it's not universal.
We have heard from many community participants, and consensus is quite rough on
this topic. The IESG discussed this thread and reached two conclusions:
(1) Rough consensus: an open and transparent standards process is more
important to the IETF than privacy of blue sheet information.
(2)
On 05/06/2012 09:46, IETF Chair wrote:
- Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
Everything else seems fine, but I'm concerned about this one. Have you
run this idea past some sort of legal counsel who is knowledgeable about
intellectual property litigation? If so, no worries.
Doug
--
Doug:
- Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
Everything else seems fine, but I'm concerned about this one. Have you
run this idea past some sort of legal counsel who is knowledgeable about
intellectual property litigation? If so, no worries.
The IETF Counsel has been consulted, and
From my following of the topic, that concensus was really rough, in
particular the part about publishing the scans on-line. That represents
a significant difference in ease access which I think required more than
the very very rough concensus you seem to think you found.
On Sun, 6 May 2012,
Please pardon this submission processing test using a different account.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://hector.wildcatblog.com
Hector wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
When I first begin to take notice a while back and last year I
decided to ask the list admin. He replied
David:
The list of participants and their addresses are already part of the
proceedings. The incremental difference shows which participants signed in at
each session.
Russ
On May 6, 2012, at 7:03 PM, David Morris wrote:
From my following of the topic, that concensus was really rough,
indeed, the following line in your header was the clue.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:10:17 -0700
this means you posted from an address not subscribed and it required
manual intervention.
randy
I consider that there is a significant difference between the information
provided in the registered attendee list and the individual blue sheets:
a) to the extent that the information on the blue sheet is valid, it
provides an hour by hour log of location, the overall list of attendees at
